It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MOMof3
Here is my where my reality is going to really frustrate you. I have never minded paying my taxes.
I lived and worked in good times. From 1968 to 2007. I could get a job anywhere, health insurance was offered at every job, pay my bills, buy a home and a car, take a yearly vacation. Now, people are working just to make it to the next paycheck.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
I thought you said you did not pay taxes, that the customer does.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
Seems to me like you suggested 'Lowering Taxes to Promote Economic Growth/Activity'.
The list and lists like it, mentioned by Sponge above, could be shortened greatly to achieve those ends.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
Everyone is a customer, even bosses.
All producers are consumers in the end too.
a reply to: CranialSponge
Point made, ouch!
My eyes nearly bled just reading it!
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Is that so? Joe works for me part time and gets $8 per hour. Cathy works full time and gets $12. The minimum wage goes to $10.10. Joe gets an effective 20% raise and makes much closer to Cathy than he did before. You think she will not ask for a raise?
I most likely would put it towards capital improvements or expansion.
originally posted by: Greven
Would she deserve more? If so, why wouldn't you have raised her pay beforehand?
You're forced to raise Joe's wage by law if you want to keep employing him. It'd be your choice to raise Cathy's or not. Isn't that how the lie goes - that people are only paid what their skills are worth? Or are you saying raising the minimum wage creates inflation?
As for a diminished government-imposed overhead, you would not necessarily create more jobs, correct? Would you agree then that lowering taxes doesn't mean creating jobs?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Why would I have had to raise her salary prior? The new dynamic this creates would, in my opinion, cause her and anyone else in her position, that of watching other people get a 20% raise just for being there and not necessarily meriting it, ask for at least the same.
It does cause inflation and unemployment as evidenced by past trends. Why should someone who I feels warrant a proportionally higher salary based on their experience and/or performance have to watch that be eroded because others feel the person getting the raise somehow 'deserves' it? Pay should be based on merit, not perception.
I think the lowering of taxes does create jobs. Business owners are more apt to use revenue for improvements or expansion and the consumer obviously has more available buying power due to the hidden tax being removed.
originally posted by: Greven
You write, immediately afterwards, that pay should be based on merit.
The historic high minimum wage was in 1968, at $1.60/hr. This is equivalent to $10.90/hr in 2014. Clearly, minimum wage cannot be the only driver of inflation. Is it a partial driver - perhaps, but how strong of one?
You know how business works - you staff for how much you need. If the minimum wage went up and you hired people at minimum wage, you wouldn't cut staff - you couldn't. You'd raise prices - you've said as much. Of course, if you raise prices too much, you'll lose business and potentially even shut down. So, the only scenario where raising the minimum wage kills jobs is when it causes businesses to close.
You said it yourself, though - you wouldn't necessarily hire more employees. You might if you expand business as a result of diminished taxes/minimum wage. Or you might make capital improvements. Perhaps you would do both. If you did not hire more staff, lowering taxes did not necessarily lead to more hiring. Correct?
originally posted by: Greven
Would she deserve more? If so, why wouldn't you have raised her pay beforehand? An increase in the minimum wage forces a minimum standard.
originally posted by: Greven
The historic high minimum wage was in 1968, at $1.60/hr. This is equivalent to $10.90/hr in 2014. Clearly, minimum wage cannot be the only driver of inflation. Is it a partial driver - perhaps, but how strong of one? You know how business works - you staff for how much you need. If the minimum wage went up and you hired people at minimum wage, you wouldn't cut staff - you couldn't. You'd raise prices - you've said as much. Of course, if you raise prices too much, you'll lose business and potentially even shut down. So, the only scenario where raising the minimum wage kills jobs is when it causes businesses to close.