originally posted by: CJCrawley
It's not the physical differences but rather the behavioural ones which should be of concern.
For example, why are blacks overrepresented in crime statistics?
Being that Western governments are hell-bent on filling up their countries with African migrants, this is a question which deserves - though probably
will never get - a speedy and truthful answer.
A speedy and truthful answer.
Ever since welfare was initiated, mothers were better off without fathers. Welfare encouraged single motherhood. Fathers who early on disappeared
from their children's lives to give them a "better life". What was once a good thing destroyed families. Soon generations followed that grew up in
homes where single motherhood and child abandonment of fathers became a norm.
As a Human Development professor I can tell you that no matter what the race, children raised without 2 parents have a much higher chance of becoming
antisocial and criminal. The mothers who do their best but are stressed and have to work long hours simply can not give the same emotional energy as
two parents. A child raised in a 2 adult home, be it mother and her mother/parents etc who have a permanent emotional investment in the child turns
out well, a child raised by just the mother no matter how hard she tries has a hugely increased risk of criminality. This is true for every racial
Then feminism went from the vote, to equal rights, to equal pay (all good things) to "women don't need men", which in turn led to the myth that
single parent homes are the same as 2 parent homes and the glamorization of single motherhood. I'll probably get a lot of flack for that one.
Unfortunately, at the time welfare was instituted many black families were very poor due to a combination of a lack of educational opportunities,
institutional racism, bigotry. Then welfare inadvertently created the multigenerational black subculture of single families, clustered in housing
projects. At the same time absentee fatherhood became the norm for many and when women went to work, the children were not only without 2 parents,
but with a overworked and exhausted single mother doing her best.
The government, specifically the Democrats have benefited from creating this underclass who blindly vote them in despite the fact that Democrats
opposed ending slavery, were the majority of KKK members. Up until a few years ago when the last of them died off there were Democrats in congress
who had been KKK leaders. But somehow the Democrats convinced the underclass that they would give them more money if voted in, however, the money
came with strings attached, only single mothers could get the money, men then had no reason to be attached to their children or to support their
In other words, the federal government structured welfare so that intentionally or unintentionally, it encouraged men to abandon their families and
women to be single parents, greatly increasing the chance that their offspring, especially males would be criminal. Historically and regardless of
race, when men live without families, they become violent and criminal.
So the truthful answer is - it has nothing to do with race -
it has to do with Eugenics, like Planned Parenthood (whose goal was to wipe out "colored people" through abortion)
if you think the government did it on purpose
or it is an unintended consequence of bad big government policies
if you think the government is good big brother or daddy in this instance.
Also, in this climate, encouraging racism has become quite beneficial for the Democratic party, to see an end to racism would be bad for Democrats.
So pointing out the racial groups who are overly represented in the antisocial groups is because of racism is a dodge. It is because of bad
government policy encouraging single parent households and the historical context of when these policies were instituted.
edit on 12-5-2014 by grandmakdw because: added last paragraph