It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While checking through older time lapse footage taken on Wednesday, 27 November 2013, 10.42 p.m I found this Gem.
Camera was on Auto pilot taking a timelapse video of Orion.
I had just moved to the coast - bay of plenty New Zealand. Between Tauranga and Whakatane.
This is what i'm using,..plus i use a canon fs36 camcorder.
to get colour i use a slower lens SMC pentax-M 1:2.1 50mm),.and i adjust the Hue setting in camcorder
to get a bright traditional green i use a fast 50mm F1.2 lens.
originally posted by: PhoenixOD
Well considering this is supposed to be 'time lapse' how can there be 2.7 seconds of smooth film? Time lapse usually takes a picture every few seconds. Even the supposed slowed down footage is smooth.
Im guessing the is lying about the speed of the film and this is more than likely speeded up a LOT.
He's hardly a fame seeker considering his views
originally posted by: PhoenixOD
a reply to: skyblueworld
He's hardly a fame seeker considering his views
Success is hardly an indication of intention.
Quite simply its impossible to have 2.7 seconds of time lapse that is smooth and also in real time. Its clearly sped up.
originally posted by: PhoenixOD
Well considering this is supposed to be 'time lapse' how can there be 2.7 seconds of smooth film? Time lapse usually takes a picture every few seconds. Even the supposed slowed down footage is smooth.
Im guessing the is lying about the speed of the film and this is more than likely speeded up a LOT.
Horsefarmer10002 hours ago
my timelapse videos with the Night vision tube a made by video recording not photo's stacked together, this is why i get a
very smooth video in slow motion rendering with twixtor
You won't see much Star twinkling in 2.7 seconds for the Debunkers as mentioned i had Dew on my lens.
regards to Star twinkling
Stars don't twinkle ,the instability of the atmosphere causes this effect,
so on a foggy night you might not see nothing and in the rain and so on or depending on your lens too is it a fasts lens or a slow one,. twinkling is weather depended ,.the twinkling will be best on a very dark clear night.
This is as real as it gets
You're not open minded when your objective is to discredit someone's claims. Skepticism on the other hand, is a healthy reaction.
There is difference between skeptics and debunkers.
A skeptic says, "maybe. lets check the facts."
A debunker says,"I know what the answer is. These things can't possibly be real." If the first explanation doesn't work, lets try a 2nd one. If that doesn't work, lets try a 3rd one.
Skepticism we need. Debunking, we do not need.
my timelapse videos with the Night vision tube a made by video recording not photo's stacked together