HRC: registration and background checks not good enough

"I think we've got to rein in what has become a almost article faith that anybody can have a gun, anywhere, anytime. I don't believe that is in the best interest of the vast majority of people."

Don't let her try to pull that "it's okay if you're licensed and registered" crap either because she hates you licensed and registered folks too:

"We really have got to get our arms around it because at the rate we are going, we are going to have so many people with guns everywhere fully licensed, fully validated," Clinton said, painting a picture of a country where small annoyances could lead to shootings.

Get that? The typical "common sense" nonsense like national registration and universal background checks aren't good enough for her. Even with UBC's and a registry she still hates you and doesnt think you should have a gun.

And the punch line?

But Clinton also gave an olive branch to gun owners, adding "I think you can say that and still support the right of people to own guns."

Right.

Hillary Clinton: US needs to rein in proliferation of guns

Hopefully with those lines on record any chance she had to win POTUS is gone.

a reply to: thisguyrighthere

But Clinton also gave an olive branch to gun owners, adding "I think you can say that and still support the right of people to own guns."

Liar.

Thats not what she means at all.

The only reason for knowing where most of the guns are through a process of registration is to facilitate their eventual confiscation. Regardless of what any of the politicians say, that is the next step.

She knows that defanging the constituency is a requirement in order to make it safer for her and her ilk to dominate the world. How can people resist if they can't shoot back?

a reply to: thisguyrighthere

Just another Progressive POS doing what a Progressive does.

Anyone that still repeats this moronic claim that Politicians don't want our firearm rights taken away is either a bald-face liar or just not paying attention.

a reply to: intrptr

They think they can trick the Politifact folks with lines like that. Some poor ignorant fool will click "HRC on guns" and see "I respect the right of Americans to own guns" and be satisfied completely discounting everything she said in the moments before her sound bite quote.

a reply to: macman

I'm sure there are some sincere fools out there who honestly believe this crap will save lives and discount any and all mentions of confiscations or bans as paranoid conspiracies.

They're what's referred to as "useful idiots."

Excuse me Mrs. Clinton, I have a question about your loyalty, your
patriotism, your honesty, your integrity as a faithful American, and
your oath to both defend and uphold the constitution of these
United States...

Would you please read the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights
aloud for us...we just want to make sure that you ACTUALLY CAN READ!!

...and then please continue

a reply to: thisguyrighthere

Hillary gives you assault rifles if you are Al Qaeda affiliated...see article.
IJ Review

a reply to: Granite

That's gold right there.

Tell Hillary I'm with AQ and Holder I'm running drugs for the cartels and they'll arm me up for free.

Got to love these politicians.

a reply to: thisguyrighthere
Precisely...

She probably hides two AK-47's between her huge thighs!

originally posted by: Granite
a reply to: thisguyrighthere
Precisely...

She probably hides two AK-47's between her huge thighs!

That is the part of it that really burns me up. All these gungrabbers either carry themselves (Dianne Feinstein), they have hired bodyguard/thugs (Rosie O'Donnell) or they have taxpayer provided protection (Hillary). They don't have to walk in our shoes and depend on a 911 response if not for self-protection.

a reply to: butcherguy

Why do the people need guns?
When you have secret service guarding you 24/7 it certainly shows her hypocrisy.
But for her to be sending arms to al Qaeda while telling the American people they don't need guns -
That's just treasonous.

When you hear them start talking about there being no need for anyone to hunt in today's modern age, then you'll know the day is upon us. Everyone likes a good hunt, and when that day comes it may be the gun owners will be the ones being hunted.

In my opinion that day will be a ways out still. They'll be crying about the poor hunted animals while they're grabbing a bit more land. It'll be a "two birds with one stone" type of thing. No pun intended.

"I think we've got to rein in what has become a almost article faith that anybody can have a gun, anywhere, anytime. I don't believe that is in the best interest of the vast majority of people."

-- The "vast majority" being law-abiding citizens who would otherwise have no need for a means of defending themselves if it weren't for the criminal minority. Who of course would benefit from total gun control. Why do these socialists always overlook that fact?

originally posted by: rival
Excuse me Mrs. Clinton, I have a question about your loyalty, your
patriotism, your honesty, your integrity as a faithful American, and
your oath to both defend and uphold the constitution of these
United States...

Would you please read the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights
aloud for us...we just want to make sure that you ACTUALLY CAN READ!!

...and then please continue

It is not just the second amendment

All gun control laws are in violation of these:

Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

www.archives.gov...

Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence

Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

All of the above are being violated.

Holding people accountable for actions they have never done, that is already against the law, and denying all gun owners their due process in a court of law.

Clinton needs reigned in, and do all those who have made it their lifetime, and parties commitment to making the only people who have guns are the police, and government.

And trying to criminalize our ownership.

a reply to: thisguyrighthere

I think politicians and their high minded arrogant ideals are what need to be reigned in.

You want to start with gun control - no problem.

Take them from the Secret service, Diplomatic Security Services and any other agency tasked with providing security for the Executive and legislative branches.

As a former 1st lady she still has secrete service protection. She also likes to lie about encounters with guns since she never took sniper fire as she claimed.

They need to get their own house in order before coming into everyone elses.