posted on May, 6 2014 @ 07:00 PM
a reply to: DietJoke
Well If you define god then your universe is much smaller as you have reduced infinite possibillity to a limited notion of self reflective projection
and remember God is why you are not the other way around as is the mistake made by many whom think that by defining the entirety that they then become
greater for it.
We are all transitory and hope to acheive a semblance of eternity but only through god can we ever do this and only by god remembering us, the
universe is created each and every instant, remember how as a child the colours were so bright, the flowers and insects so fascinating and beutiful
and the sky so big, well we actually learn to ignore it but it is still there but takes a child to see it.
Also your definition is limited in that it limits your god to the time space continuum, aka the cosmos which to us seems huge and even near infinite
but is in reality as far from infinite as we are, it is more than possible and I think even plausible and likely that a universe in which
consciousness exists and can interact with the nature of reality is itself alive and aware but it is not the absolute god and above that particular
mountain there is a huge sky if you catch my analogy and that is even larger and even more aware.
I think though the only god I am interested in knowing is the one whom actually care's about the individual ant's, not the one for whom they are too
small and insignificant to even notice, so you definition is both correct and yet too small, also god is outside the universe though god
interpenetrates it at all points in time and space.
Indeed your definition would more aptly fit the archangel Uriel whom holds creation (the world) in his hand.
And we are all children of God as is all life and indeed the universe itself.
edit on 6-5-2014 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)