It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What Yes/No devices do they use then which require some mechanical manipulation? The maglite torches need either a push button to be pressed or the lens cover to be turned etc. This is the kind of device I think should be developed for more definite proof of influence.
You are a bit late as Ghost Adventures has been using equipment that produces voices and whole sentences electronicly or realime that they claim is ghost voices, not to be misstaken with EVP's. The Maglite is old news.
If you can actually have the ghost speaking to you why use a yes/no device.
But the use of suroundings in the room like doors, curtains or furnitures and props like balls or other balancing objects is used for non electronic yes/no respons.
If ghost can manipulate things it should maybe be a balancing device that can be pushed by little force to the left or right taking in to acount wind or draft.
Oh BTW, they allready made a more silent version of the Spirit box using it in newer episodes.
originally posted by: slippeddisc
i've got two 'ghost boxes' one of them is the P-SB7 that Ghost Adventures use and its awful, i rarely use that one. but i always get communication when ever i do an evp. i have no idea how to make one and i would love a ghost box that is a little more quiet on the white noise, people do make them but theres no way i'l pay hundreds for one. i wish someone would invent something easier, i would have thought the ouija board would have been the easiest but i've never got one to work.
originally posted by: qmantoo
Why should there be a law/rule which says that they should not communicate knowledge to us? In fact, there are plenty of ways to get this information and to communicate but most of them are subjective. If we are to ever get more information about the other dimensions, then we have to bring the communication into the scientific arena so that it can be studied in an objective way. Currently as far as I know there is no way to repeat a contact experiment. You cannot make an appointment to speak with someone or ask them to show up at a particular time or place. Repeatability is the key which science seems to require and things like ghosties are very hit and miss.
Using no paragraphs is really difficult to read and most people probably wont bother - so you may want to change that in the future perhaps?
Because the illusion is on-going we might be creating the proof, and telling ourselves what we want most to hear.
originally posted by: qmantoo
anonentity -
Using no paragraphs is really difficult to read and most people probably wont bother - so you may want to change that in the future perhaps?
Because the illusion is on-going we might be creating the proof, and telling ourselves what we want most to hear.
However, if, as I suspect, that many messages from the spirit world through mediums are not from other entities, we dont have any real proof anyway. I suspect that many mediums use a combination of energy field reading and good non-verbal communication signs from the client.
I have been to many mediums in the past and many of those I believed were good readings, but I believe there is not much that can be told to us which cannot be picked up from the energy fields around us. Basically, we have to develop the ability to tap into these other dimensions ourselves without relying on others to do it for us.
Once we are able to do that we will become a lot wiser and understand more of how the universe is put together. People who claim they can contact entities from other realities should refuse to do it for others but should encourage these others to be able to do it for themselves. That way, there would be no chance of manipulation or hoaxing because we would all just know for ourselves. History is rife with sooth sayers and mediums from the Romans to Hitler to modern-day royalty all consulting them. I wonder what decisions have been made on the say-so of an energy reading.