It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: smithjustinb
And I'd like to enjoy my life by shooting the next guy who cuts me off in traffic. After all, the world doesn't revolve around him, and it would be very enjoyable for me.
Unfortunately, for you, murder is not supported by the constitution of the U.S. The right to assembly, however, is.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: smithjustinb
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: smithjustinb
And I'd like to enjoy my life by shooting the next guy who cuts me off in traffic. After all, the world doesn't revolve around him, and it would be very enjoyable for me.
Unfortunately, for you, murder is not supported by the constitution of the U.S. The right to assembly, however, is.
Sure it is, but it's limited. You have the right to defend yourself, and during war, it's okay. You do not, however, have the right to shoot anyone, any time. You have the right to assembly, but the constitution doesn't say you have the right anywhere, anytime.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting... interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
If 50 people can assemble peaceably, then no law can be legally made to strip them from their right to assemble altogether. Period.
Anywhere. Anytime. Peaceably.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: smithjustinb
If 50 people can assemble peaceably, then no law can be legally made to strip them from their right to assemble altogether. Period.
Anywhere. Anytime. Peaceably.
So I can gather 100 of my liberal friends to assemble peaceably on your front lawn at midnight? Anywhere, anytime, right? As long as it's peaceably and we're being weeeeewy qwiet.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: smithjustinb
No one is saying they can't peaceably assemble.
They can peaceably assemble in an area that can more easily accommodate a large group.
I'll say this again. I don't think this new zoning ordinance is necessary, because there are already laws that stop gatherings from disturbing the peace. What I AM saying is, you repeatedly disturb my peace, and I'm gonna turn you in and make it stop. I don't care what the purpose of your gathering is.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: SilentKillah
Did you read why the county was doing this in the first place? Because of residential complaints. If your neighbors are not complaining about you, you think the cop cares whether you are having a party? They aren't doing this for any reason other than to shut up the complaining residents. It's total overkill, in my opinion, but I guess the squeaky wheel gets the oil. So, you and your neighbors and friends should complain loudly to the county, and maybe they'll drop it. Just be squeakier than the others.
On February 18, 2014, Zoning Administration and Code Compliance staff presented the Board of Supervisors' Development Process Committee (Committee) with draft Zoning Ordinance text that limits the number of persons and frequency of large gatherings at a home. The Committee requested feedback from residents on the proposed text, and to that end, a series of open community dialogues are scheduled for this purpose as follows:
Wednesday, May 7, 2014 from 7 - 9 p.m. at South County Government Center, 8350 Richmond Highway, Alexandria, VA 22309, in the Main Conference Room (SCC221)
Monday, May 12, 2014 from 7 - 9 p.m. at Fairfax County Government Center, 12000 Government Center Parkway, Fairfax, VA 22035 in the Board Auditorium
Monday, May 19, 2014 from 7 - 9 p.m. at Lemon Road Elementary School, 7230 Idylwood Road, Falls Church, VA 22043 in the school cafeteria
These community meetings will also address proposed revisions to the Noise Ordinance. The results of this community feedback for both issues will be discussed with the Committee at a future meeting.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
I think it DOES represent residential neighborhoods of Fairfax county only, as that is the sole purpose of the proposed ordinance.
Thing is, it's not even finalized yet. Those big bad boogeymen are actually allowing a place for community feedback on the PROPOSED ordinance.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
You make it sound like they are doing the residents a favor by holding public hearings. They are obligated to do so as part of their county governmental requirements.
What I'm saying is, they aren't being lawless, unconstitutional monsters, hell-bent on taking away all of our rights.