It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: xuenchen
Obviously another moronic republican that doesn't understand the United States Constitution. A judge can't indict a sitting president. Only the House can bring forth articles of Impeachment.
I mean seriously? Do you guys believe everything your FOX News masters tell you to think?
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: openminded2011
I have a major problem with that logic, personally. Relativism to justify the bad actions in one situation by pointing to the bad actions of another just insure the bad actions never end. It does't do anything to make either situation right.
Should 9/11 have been (and still needs to be) thoroughly investigated by those outside the Hen house? Absolutely it does.
Should falling down on that duty mean it's okay to ignore whatever the root cause was, which led to the over-run and total destruction of a U.S. State Department facility? Well....How many more of these do we want to see happen in coming years? Folks don't seem to consider the lesson the rest of the world and those who dislike us most, took from this.
We aren't the nation of Somalia rescue efforts for Americans trapped and cut off. We're the America that really doesn't know what the heck to do anymore, and, at best, gets into second guessing and hand wringing until the whole need for action has passed. That is an exceptionally dangerous example to have set in a world like we see around us right now, IMO.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: openminded2011
I pointed out the several embassy attacks during Bush's term in another thread.
And I mentioned I didn't recall them lying about anything either.
This Benghazi issue is about the highest officials lying and covering up.
Obama is at the helm.
HE will be the answer guy.
Anything else is ancient history being used as a typical diversion tactic.
Wow, 911 is ancient history now?
originally posted by: Destinyone
a reply to: Snarl
Good times for discussions it will be Snarl. I'm looking at the mid-terms being some of the most brutal, contentious and desperate non presidential elections we've seen in a long time.
Des
originally posted by: Secret009
originally posted by: xuenchen
Related article.
Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro has launched a scathing, on-air indictment of President Barack Obama, calling for his impeachment from office.
On Saturday night’s broadcast of “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” Pirro uncorked a blistering verbal assault on Obama in connection with his handling of the fatal onslaught of the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, and the subsequent cover-up.
“Mr. President, it’s called an abrogation of duty,” Pirro said. “You have not taken your oath to honestly and faithfully execute the duties of your office. As commander in chief, you have NOT protected us. This dereliction of duty as commander in chief demands your impeachment.”
Judge Jeanine unleashed: Impeach Obama
a reply to: xuenchen
Really? Benghazi was worse than IRAN CONTRA? It's bad enough that conservative morons lack a political compass (to them, communism is equal fascism, despite them being polar opposites, which results in them using the terms incorrectly as a synonym for 'bad') but now are totally devoid of anything resembling tact or proportion. The Iran contra scandal involved US funded foreign death squads. Benghazi involved a revised talking point after the fact. How utterly LOST these cretins are.
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: Secret009
originally posted by: xuenchen
Related article.
Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro has launched a scathing, on-air indictment of President Barack Obama, calling for his impeachment from office.
On Saturday night’s broadcast of “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” Pirro uncorked a blistering verbal assault on Obama in connection with his handling of the fatal onslaught of the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, and the subsequent cover-up.
“Mr. President, it’s called an abrogation of duty,” Pirro said. “You have not taken your oath to honestly and faithfully execute the duties of your office. As commander in chief, you have NOT protected us. This dereliction of duty as commander in chief demands your impeachment.”
Judge Jeanine unleashed: Impeach Obama
a reply to: xuenchen
Really? Benghazi was worse than IRAN CONTRA? It's bad enough that conservative morons lack a political compass (to them, communism is equal fascism, despite them being polar opposites, which results in them using the terms incorrectly as a synonym for 'bad') but now are totally devoid of anything resembling tact or proportion. The Iran contra scandal involved US funded foreign death squads. Benghazi involved a revised talking point after the fact. How utterly LOST these cretins are.
Try a little more name calling, it could help make your point.
originally posted by: TownCryer
a reply to: xuenchen
Whoa! An unknown judge calls for Obama's impeachment! Wow! Now we'll see some action, right?
Geez... It's not going to happen. The crazy ramblings of some judicial nobody mean nothing. You'd think the GOP would get tired of making themselves look incompetent. But Noooo. I know, let's have another Obama-Care overturn vote. Yeah! I'm sure the 48th vote will do the trick. No? OK, how about another vote to outlaw abortion? Yeah! That always works.
Losers - nothing but butt-hurt old white guys STILL bent out of shape about losing TWO elections, (so far anyway...loss # 3 is only a little over 2 years away....). This is the kind of wing-nut refusal to move on that prevents the GOP from appealing to enough voters to win a national election. Good, as far as I'm concerned. I hope they never win another election. They're marginalizing themselves right out of existance. I only wish they'd do it faster so our country can finally get back to working again.