It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
He has already put in place presidential directives to do everything from the NDAA act to enact martial law keeping him in office longer. There are even directives that says the government can pull up and confiscate the food and water you have stored for this kind or and kind of disaster for that matter and redistribute it to the public.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
He has already put in place presidential directives to do everything from the NDAA act to enact martial law keeping him in office longer. There are even directives that says the government can pull up and confiscate the food and water you have stored for this kind or and kind of disaster for that matter and redistribute it to the public.
You can of course link to valid sources to all of those claims....?
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Did they impeach reagan for the iran contra affair
originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: buster2010
I like the way you think.
Another reason to impeach (ETA: after all ... Obama is the Commander In Chief ... higher than the SecDef even). A trial would get to the bottom of things rather quickly ... and responsible parties would be named!!
originally posted by: buster2010
Where is her proof they brought rocket propelled grenades to the protest when it is known that the consulate had a stockpile of weapons put there by the CIA. She is right there is a coverup like how she complained about the lack of security but never mentioned it was the Republicans that pushed for security funds to be cut. Also it would help for her to learn how things work in the government. The Secretary of Defense is responsible for security at the embassy and consulates not the president and the person in charge of security was Charlene Lamb. When she was questioned on the lack of security she simply said we didn't have the funds. So shouldn't the Republicans be impeached for their lack of defense for Americans?
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
Nation Defense Act
Ecexutive Order - National Defense Resources Preparedness Act
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
Nation Defense Act
Nothing there about martial law different to any previous act....
Ecexutive Order - National Defense Resources Preparedness Act
again, nothing there about confiscating food and water any different to any previous one....
So as expected no sources for your claims!
But if you are looking for blame, 10% is hardly the place to start.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: MarlinGrace
But if you are looking for blame, 10% is hardly the place to start.
Any percent is a place to start. When you have the person in charge of security saying we don't have the funds then you have cut funds too much. So it's obvious that the security of these people were not in the republicans interest but they want to scream when people get killed.
originally posted by: hangedman13
If they did not have the funds to protect a embassy there why open one up in the first place? Setting up shop in post civil war Libya seems rather foolhardy does it not? More to this than what we have been told and blaming the Republicans for cutting funding is stupid when the administration with the D next to them still went and opened up a embassy in a location that was known to have Al Qaeda lurking about. Yea the funding for embassy protection was cut, but you go and set one up anyway knowing it is not properly protected Someone in the administration needs to own up to this logistic screw up.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Related article.
Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro has launched a scathing, on-air indictment of President Barack Obama, calling for his impeachment from office.
On Saturday night’s broadcast of “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” Pirro uncorked a blistering verbal assault on Obama in connection with his handling of the fatal onslaught of the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, and the subsequent cover-up.
“Mr. President, it’s called an abrogation of duty,” Pirro said. “You have not taken your oath to honestly and faithfully execute the duties of your office. As commander in chief, you have NOT protected us. This dereliction of duty as commander in chief demands your impeachment.”
Judge Jeanine unleashed: Impeach Obama
Shortly after the October 2011 death of Qaddafi, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced in Tripoli that the U.S. was committing $40 million to help Libya “secure and recover its weapons stockpiles.” Department of State Assistant Secretary Andrew Shapiro confirms DOS had a weapons buy-back program in Libya that was also supported by the UK who gave $1.5 million, the Netherlands gave $1.2 million, Germany gave about $1 million and our neighbor to the north, Canada gave $1.6 million to purchase the deadly arsenal that went missing after the fall of Qaddafi.
The State Department was specifically looking to acquire the 20,000 MANPADS (they are commonly known as man-portable air shoulder-fire missiles) that went missing once Qaddafi was killed.
Did CIA and State Department Run Illegal Arms Trafficking in Benghazi?