a reply to: VirusGuard Agreed.Everyone keeps their jobs everyone keeps their mouths shut.As the governor said the commission's
only job was just to provide lip service and to rubber stamp the already prepared story.I think Off The Grid needs to do a another series of
investigations into 9/11 this time looking at all the missed opportunities the CIA and FBI had to stop this.As for the recent revelation of the mole
it's yet another dot that was intentionally disconnected.
Although what you see now are questions and conspiracies, at the time it went exactly according to plan.
You must be able to see lengths we've gone to to disguise preparations for the invasion of Russia and China.
originally posted by: aightism2
bombs in buildings ?
who planted them Larry Silverstein
Who ordered the demolitions Larry Silverstein
who got paid by the insurance company Larry Silverstein
Who owned the insurance company that paid him ... ?????
he had to be in on it because if I owned it Larry would be in jail for attempted fraud I say attempted because the collapse of all 3 building
defies logic as well as physics and insurance companys are clued up on physics and logic they successfully rebut claims all the time using both
forms of thinking Larrys claim was a joke like the 9/11 commission report the failiure to respond was a simple stand down order jesse is asking the
How about the faulty steel that melted at 1800F instead of the rated 2600F? That's not the architect's fault.
It's not that the steel was faulty, it's that there was nano-thermite cutting key structural sections of the building out before the final collapse,
which was, of course, precipitated by the demolitions placed on what I can only assume was every, or almost every floor, which allowed for the
buildings to appear to follow the path of most resistance, and fall nearly directly into it's own footprint, and to do so at nearly free fall speed.
It's as if there was nothing there to resist the collapse of the buildings. I'm not joking when I say, I've seen far smaller, and seemingly far easier
structures to demolish (quite a few actually), that were intentionally being attempted to demolish, by professionals, that did not collapse nearly as
well (or didn't collapse at all) as the three buildings did on 9/11.
Here's just a sniff:
edit on 3-5-2014 by 7918465230 because: (no reason given)
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2016, The Above Network, LLC.