It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: smurfy
develop a patent working on their time, using their information, and their materials. Any patent you develop while working for a company belongs to them free and clear.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: Zaphod58
For the sake of argument or to contrast the difference...I seem to recall Google allowing people to keep their own creations and work...IF that was done under Google's 20% policy (which I'm not sure exists anymore). However, it was restrictive about that 1/5th time rule they had and I'll bet there was a stack of paper to make a lawyer catch his breath in making that proper and viable.
Assumed ownership is to the employer when on company time. That's how I've always understood it.
The carrier does have a data-sharing agreement with engine maker Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc (RR/) for its wide-body fleet. New Scientist magazine reported, without saying where it got the information, that the missing 777 sent two bursts of data before contact was lost.
“We continue to monitor the situation and provide our full support to Malaysia Airlines,” said Richard Hedges, a spokesman for London-based Rolls-Royce. He declined to elaborate.
originally posted by: flyandi--->Modern aircrafts like the 777's have extended glide capabilities and probably pretty extensive emergency glide procedures programmed into the autopilot.
originally posted by: Ivar_Karlsen
originally posted by: flyandi--->Modern aircrafts like the 777's have extended glide capabilities and probably pretty extensive emergency glide procedures programmed into the autopilot.
If both engines flame out due to fuel starvation automation wont matter because it will disconnect.
Even with two alive and well pilots ditching out at the open sea have a very narrow chanse for a happy outcome.
With unconscious or dead pilots the plane would not hit the water in a survivable way.
originally posted by: STANDARD
I will say it again, the plane was shot down by military jets.
originally posted by: flyandi
originally posted by: Ivar_Karlsen
originally posted by: flyandi--->Modern aircrafts like the 777's have extended glide capabilities and probably pretty extensive emergency glide procedures programmed into the autopilot.
If both engines flame out due to fuel starvation automation wont matter because it will disconnect.
Even with two alive and well pilots ditching out at the open sea have a very narrow chanse for a happy outcome.
With unconscious or dead pilots the plane would not hit the water in a survivable way.
The Batteries will still be full at that time and the RAT probably deployed shortly before the engines actual turned off. It's not like an airplane can't fly without engines.
here is a list of famous gliding cases:
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: Ektar
a reply to: smurfy
I am curious to know if you are signed to a major
record label or film company & during your "assigned time"
you write new songs who owns them, you or them?
I am not not being funny, I have been there to some extent...
Patent Laws & Music Laws are a mess. Thank you for your time.
Cheers
Ektar
originally posted by: cayrichard
Conspiracy theorists won't buy this, stating that the lower bodies were photoshopped on a picture of the two standing together. If this were true it would suggest some ridiculous scenario, implicating the US or Israel ; truly ludicrous.