It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
I am sure she is waiting to be president do prosecute the guilty ones.
I couldn't care less what Hillary is doing or saying on the topic...or any other topic for that matter. She's not my cup-o-tea, let's leave it at that.
It's a fact that people died in Benghazi and the people in charge royally screwed-up, but are we honestly going to believe for a second that anyone is going to be held accountable?
This is just another event that will be used as campaign fodder until after the election.....and never heard about again. If someone is held to account, it will be a low-level flunkie that probably was just doing as he was told.
So I find the entire discussion rather pointless. But that's just my opinion.
originally posted by: tsingtao
geee, you forgot to say, "what difference does it make?!"
day late a dollar short guys.
plenty of marines in Jamaica and england, right? but benghazi? yeah, use some local yokels for security.
you are full of it gryphon, you are walking back all your positions and late to the party.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
I'm sure she'd love for us to talk about how she sets up government contracts to profit her husband's business interests and exempts her own holdings and the holdings of her own supporters from minimum wage laws.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
Can I ask why we all weren't outraged when embassies and consulates were attacked during Bush's presidency? Oh wait, the Republicans didn't see that as a major talking point. Never mind!
If these people could get away with it they would have probably attacked the embassy themselves, killed the Americans inside, decapitated the Ambassador and then been on here the next damn day asking "Why didn't you do more to stop us from doing this horrible act!"
Okay, first question.
1) Some of you clearly see a cover-up on the part of the Obama Administration. Is the beginning and end of the cover-up the statements that were made regarding the attack being the result of riots/anger in Benghazi over the video "Innocence of Muslims" as opposed to being a coordinated military-style attack conducted by terrorists (which have turned out to be Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi and Ansar al-Sharia in Darnah)?
A Senate report on the Benghazi attack that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans bolsters Obama administration critics who suspected from the start that al-Qaeda was involved and that it was not a spontaneous protest that went out of control.
The report, released Wednesday by the committee's Democratic majority, said individuals affiliated with groups such as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula were in on the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. compound.
Senate says no doubt al-Qaeda in on Benghazi