It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rosneft has recently signed a series of big contracts for oil exports to China and is close to signing a "jumbo deal" with Indian companies. In both deals, there are no US dollars involved. Reuters reports, that Russia is close to entering a goods-for-oil swap transaction with Iran that will give Rosneft around 500,000 barrels of Iranian oil per day to sell in the global market.
Russia is preparing the announcement of the "Holy Grail" energy deal with none other than China, a move which would send geopolitical shockwaves around the world and bind the two nations in a commodity-backed axis. One which, as some especially on these pages, have suggested would lay the groundwork for a new joint, commodity-backed reserve currency that bypasses the dollar
originally posted by: tridentblue
a reply to: AnIntellectualRedneck
Could be. I always remember the quote "The first casualty when war comes is truth", and I take all things with a grain of salt. But there is certainly a narrative that the US is behind the uprisings in Ukraine and Syria, and that coupled with the so called "Asia pivot" The advent of a unified BRICS opposition seems likely.
My concern is with the USA itself. This article:
en.wikipedia.org...
Terrifies me. I see this, about what Americans do:
farming, forestry, and fishing: (fundamentals of life) 0.7%
manufacturing, extraction, transportation, and crafts: (fundamentals of civilized life) 20%
managerial, professional, and technical[disambiguation needed]: 37%
sales and office: 24%
other services: 18% (2009)
So the managerial (37%) and office (24%)! and other (18%) need to be separated in the article, to hide the fact that America now produces almost nothing tangible, except for people sitting behind desk, engaged in fictitious financial services and pencil pushing. All the manufacturing jobs have gone to China. We no longer control the means of production of our own lives, everything we buy is made in China. And we're supposed to be projecting force to Asia? I suppose we could send them angry invoices for financial services, but then again they could cut off everything we buy and rely on.
That's what it all comes down to for me. I don't think Russia's government is great, I don't think China's government is great, I think the spirit of the American people is great. But I see a power structure here in the US - including government - that has become so divorced from the spirit of the American people, and so delusional, that its in serious danger from the sort of changes you talk about. So yeah, probably some challenging times ahead.
originally posted by: john666
Russia and NATO countries are allies. The "Ukranian crisis" is a simulation.
Proof of their alliance:
en.ria.ru...
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
originally posted by: john666
Russia and NATO countries are allies. The "Ukranian crisis" is a simulation.
Proof of their alliance:
en.ria.ru...
That article is dated September of 2013. A LOT has happened in the time inbetween and Russia is now the target of extensive sanctions which, if one can believe the economists, is helping along a recession within the Russian Federation.
If that's allies..then it's between individual men. not between nations. since the little people aren't going to see anything but a shaft and a half from this whole thing if it turns to shooting.
originally posted by: john666
originally posted by: tridentblue
a reply to: AnIntellectualRedneck
My concern is with the USA itself. This article:
...
America would have never have allowed itself to be dependent on China in such degree(economical), if China was not part of NWO.
originally posted by: tridentblue
originally posted by: john666
originally posted by: tridentblue
a reply to: AnIntellectualRedneck
My concern is with the USA itself. This article:
...
America would have never have allowed itself to be dependent on China in such degree(economical), if China was not part of NWO.
Very likely. I still remember the "Battle in Seattle" in 99. What's hitting in a hard way is the fact that Mr Clinton's assurances that this was good for America are ringing pretty darn hollow now. The ideals of economic globalism now strike me as a front for something else, something much more transformative, that requires the collapse of American capitalism in its current form. That's pretty big news to the average working Joe like me.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: john666
Well... I hope you're right. I wish I hadn't heard and/or read those very same statements made before other shooting started, in other conflicts in the past.
It's the belief war cannot happen, which seems to often insure that is how events will turn.
That's my opinion though, based on little more than 40 some odd years kicking around this country and being a student of history as a real serious hobby.
originally posted by: john666
originally posted by: tridentblue
originally posted by: john666
originally posted by: tridentblue
a reply to: AnIntellectualRedneck
My concern is with the USA itself. This article:
...
America would have never have allowed itself to be dependent on China in such degree(economical), if China was not part of NWO.
Very likely. I still remember the "Battle in Seattle" in 99. What's hitting in a hard way is the fact that Mr Clinton's assurances that this was good for America are ringing pretty darn hollow now. The ideals of economic globalism now strike me as a front for something else, something much more transformative, that requires the collapse of American capitalism in its current form. That's pretty big news to the average working Joe like me.
Russia is also part of NWO.
YOU see, about one third of oil and gas supplies, that EU consumes, comes from Russia.
If Russia and EU("the West"), were enemies, the EU would never have allowed itself to be so dependent on Russia's oil and gas supplies.
originally posted by: Vovin
originally posted by: john666
originally posted by: tridentblue
originally posted by: john666
originally posted by: tridentblue
a reply to: AnIntellectualRedneck
My concern is with the USA itself. This article:
...
America would have never have allowed itself to be dependent on China in such degree(economical), if China was not part of NWO.
Very likely. I still remember the "Battle in Seattle" in 99. What's hitting in a hard way is the fact that Mr Clinton's assurances that this was good for America are ringing pretty darn hollow now. The ideals of economic globalism now strike me as a front for something else, something much more transformative, that requires the collapse of American capitalism in its current form. That's pretty big news to the average working Joe like me.
Russia is also part of NWO.
YOU see, about one third of oil and gas supplies, that EU consumes, comes from Russia.
If Russia and EU("the West"), were enemies, the EU would never have allowed itself to be so dependent on Russia's oil and gas supplies.
Except that economic growth means much more than security to neoliberal countries. If you want to see a country that realizes its economic growth is built on pillars of clay, then look at the American police state that is evolving to enslave its own population through fear when their transnational corporations, having already taken production out of the USA, leave the USA altogether.