It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
still wouldn,t be any basis in story cause surely if the client knew he killed them then he would look round as if to say what the hell and even if he didn,t kill them he would do the exact same thing?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
In a criminal justice system based on 12 individuals not smart enough to get out of jury duty, here is a jury to be proud of:
A defendant was on trial for murder.
There was strong evidence indicating guilt,but there was no corpse.
In the defence's closing statement,the lawyer, knowing that his client would probably be convicted, resorted to a trick.
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,I have a surprise for you all," the lawyer said as he looked at his watch.
"Within one minute, the person presumed dead in this case will walk into this courtroom."
He looked toward the courtroom door.
The jurors, somewhat stunned, all looked on eagerly.
A minute passed. Nothing happened.
Finally, the lawyer said,"Actually, I made up the previous statement. But you all looked on with anticipation.
I, therefore, put it to you that you have a reasonable doubt in this case as to whether anyone was killed,and I insist that you return a verdict of not guilty."
The jury retired to deliberate.
A few minutes later, the jury returned and pronounced a verdict of guilty.
"But how?" inquired the lawyer.
You must have had some doubt; I saw all of you stare at the door."
The jury foreman replied:"Yes, we did look, But your client didn't."
My uncle sent me this story and I am not sure if it any basis in reality but I thought it was worth repeating here.