posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 03:34 PM
a reply to: six67seven
Indeed though I believe that an ancient war and a lost age of technology are factual despite little or no accepted mainstream evidence you are
correct in you observation, that looks to me to be an ancient eroded ziggurat or similar structure which the outher ring would have been a defencive
ditch or wall/both and in all likelyhood the site itself is on a hill that can not be seen due to sun angle and downward view, much of the site
appears to have been destroyed by later agriculture and farmers removing stones from there field's or reusing them elsewhere (ninevah was found after
locals told of a hill that was a good place to dig for bricks).
That being said there used to be story's of satellite photographs held by the intelligence services which showed huge ancient road systems older than
any known civilization which led to devasted area's where they terminated, these area's though overgrown had no ruin's but lot's of road like
connection's as if the destruction was total, I searched through an early issue of google earth and found something that may have been of interest on
the canadian/alaskan side of the arctic circle which looked like a perfect streight road or rail line but broken in places leading to feint grid like
pattern in the tundra about the size of a modern city but then the area was a hive of top secret activity during the cold war and whom know's what
asset's may still be hidden there by both former and renewed protagonists form the old cold war the new one.
In the story's though areas with grid patterns and road's like modern highway's were mentioned in the amazon and other rainforrests detected by
sattelites as well as cratered ruin's.
On a similar vain there are some Extremely road like structure's and possible ruins on our nearest planetary neighbour (and allegedly on the moon as
In this day and age any recovery of ancient artifacts is something that the intelligence services would deny and any technology would likely have
degraded to a point far beyond any reversable engineering state unless it was in orbit and that is an entire other thread but here is something about
craters in ruins on earth,
But craters on the ground are early nuclear type devices which today are called crust crackers and outlawed by international convention as they throw
so much radio active debris into the atmosphere they spread the devastation over more than one target area and country, instead today we have a
technology called airburst which means that at optimum altitude the nuclear device will detonate over a city or target to cause maximum damage with
minimum fallout (there is still a mushroom cloud and still vast amounts of fallout), now of course in the age of deep underground military base's the
crust cracker is back on the cards as little else with dent them but a high yield nuclear device used in a shaped explosion at or near ground level
will devastate even miles deep bases under dense granite or basalt, indeed solid granit or basalt can be used to dissipate or channel the shock wave
and mixed strata provide the best shelter.
Old bases such as Yementu in russia and Norad in the states are so weakened due to a lack of mixed stratification over them and devices for
destroying such were definitely developed during the cold war but perhaps not tested.
Are all the DUMB's bases though or could some be excavations of a more intriguing nature.
edit on 28-4-2014 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)