It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why all the drama, media manipulation, name-calling, if this is such a simple cut and dried case?
originally posted by: beezzer
Still reading, a lot to take in.
But I have questions that I hope can be answered within this well written thread!
As stated in another thread, I said;
All this drama. Guns. Snipers. Tasers. Dogs. Drones (?) Racism. Media bias. If the government has such a lock-solid case, if the folks at the ranch and supporters are nothing but domestic terrorists, then what is wrong with just reporting the truth, the facts? Why hasn't the media stated, unequivocally, that Bundy is guilty and laid out the facts? - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Why all the drama, media manipulation, name-calling, if this is such a simple cut and dried case?
Don't you think that wishing for milita and deaths and wounded people and so on isn't a little over the top, even for patriots?
Don't you think that everyone should calm down and have this cleared up by some wise guys? If those are not available, maybe some lawyers?
originally posted by: stormcell
To me, the oppression started when Clark county bought up and retired the grazing rights. Bundy wanted to buy them but was outbid by the state itself. If that hadn't happened, then these events and discussion threads wouldn't even exist.
In his Reply (#7), Bundy explains this action startedin 1992 when he received a "Full Force and EffectDecision Bunkerville Allotment" from the BLM. Reply(#7), p. 5. The letter to which Bundy refers is in factdated January 28, 1993. Bundy claims this "decisionconcerning the Desert Tortoise, if fully implemented,would lead to the end of ranching in Clark County," andhis ranching days would be over. Reply (#7), p. 5. The decision from the BLM does not inform [*8] Bundy he can no longer graze livestock due to the protection of the Desert Tortoise, but instead reminds Bundy that his grazing permit would end at the end of the next month,February 1993, and the new permit application was attached to the decision. The decision informed Bundy the BLM would issue him a new ten-year federal grazing permit for the Bunkerville Allotment. Mot. Dism. (#4),Exh. E. The terms and conditions for the new federal grazing permit allowed for livestock grazing with some restrictions to be determined by the BLM. For example,if tortoises were found to be active in the early spring ina specific area, then grazing would not be allowed until the amount of spring ephemeral forage had grown to a sufficient amount.
20. BLM has closed the public lands within the Gold Butte area (with the exception of the Lower Mormon Mesa) to livestock grazing. Clark County previously purchased and retired all grazing privileges in the area to minimize and mitigate impacts to the desert tortoise in connection with the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Pursuant to that Plan, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service issued Clark County an Incidental Take Permit under Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act for development activities on other County lands within desert tortoise habitat.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
"Possession is nine-tenths of the law" come and take it
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: xuenchen
Okay, perhaps I am confused as to what exactly you are questioning?
Did you have a question about the application for grazing? Or about Bundy's water rights?
Can you clarify?