It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bkleinhe99
I didn't pay myself a salary for 3 years, I didn't save or invest in our retirement...there were times where we were brought to our needs by the magnitude of having so much debt over our heads. I would never do it again....however I worked hard through it all and thanks to an understanding wife today the business is successful and I make over $500K a year.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: bkleinhe99
I didn't pay myself a salary for 3 years, I didn't save or invest in our retirement...there were times where we were brought to our needs by the magnitude of having so much debt over our heads. I would never do it again....however I worked hard through it all and thanks to an understanding wife today the business is successful and I make over $500K a year.
I have been in the same place that you were and I admire your fortitude. I think if the people clamoring for higher tax rates actually tried to start and operate their own businesses they would have a paradigm change in a matter of days.
originally posted by: jimmyx
yes absolutely...especially if you set up a "S" corporation...www.ftb.ca.gov...
let's see...no federal taxes...1.5% state tax ON PROFITS ONLY...write-offs include salaries, etc...so burdensome, right?
Still yet you can't conceive of the idea that the rich don't eat at McDonalds so when you pay more than a entry level wage who pays for it? You refuse to get that the Walmart customer isn't rich, lets give all the employees a $10.00 hr. raise.
'Corporate welfare'
The current system amounts to a form of "corporate welfare," Unz said. Major chains like Walmart and McDonald's keep their employees' wages low, knowing the government will provide them with food stamps and medical care to compensate for their low pay.
An October study co-authored by researchers at the UC Berkeley Labor Center found that 52 percent of the families of fast-food workers are enrolled in one or more public assistance programs, compared with 25 percent of the workforce as a whole.
www.npr.org...
RON UNZ: Well, I think there are very strong liberal and conservative reasons for raising the minimum wage. Right now, $250 billion a year in social welfare spending goes to workers who can't survive on their paychecks. What we're talking about is a massive system of hidden government subsidies for these low-wage employers where they can shift the costs of the workforce over to the taxpayer. I think businesses should stand on their own two feet and have to pay their workers instead of forcing the taxpayers to make up the difference.
Furthermore, the price rises we're talking about are very much smaller than most people would realize. Wal-Mart is America's largest low-wage employer. Three hundred thousand Wal-Mart workers average about $9 an hour. All Wal-Mart would have to do to cover a $12 minimum wage is raise their prices by 1.1 percent one time. The average Wal-Mart shopper would pay only an extra $12.50 per year. People wouldn't even notice the price hike.
www.ronunz.org...
Today in California, the polls show overwhelming support for a large rise in the minimum wage, and the idea has now been endorsed by multi-billionaires of the left, right, and center. Let’s hope that such potent combination of dollars and voter sentiment quickly produces enacted legislation and causes the issue to permanently vanish from the political radar screen just as would be suggested by my theory.
www.salon.com...
McDonald’s and fast-food places would probably have to raise their prices by 8 or 9 percent, something like that. Agricultural products that are American-grown would go up by less than 2 percent on the grocery shelves. And those sorts of price increases are so small that they would be almost unnoticed in most cases by the consumer.
I would actually argue that if you are looking at a company like Walmart that is suffering economically these days, because so many of the Walmart shoppers are getting too poor to shop ar Walmart, what you are talking about is shifting up to maybe $150 billion a year from the sort of families that don’t shop at Walmart to the sort of families that do shop at Walmart. Walmart raises their prices by 1 percent, roughly one time, and they get a huge amount of extra business.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
I say that is not good enough!
There should be an 80% tax on all personal assets over $3 Million because $3 Million is the accepted savings needed for a comfortable retirement. With exemptions for the primary residence, and one vehicle per person in the household. That would bring about true income equality.
How about it!
Should we start a white house petition so that people who live off trust funds and hide money in stocks/bonds and other sources of "non-income, income" which is currently not considered income will have to live off what the rest of us do.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
Have you ever played monopoly if so you know what happens when all the money is hoarded.
Unlike the Game, there is not a finite supply of wealth.
where else can you live that your vote counts the same as any rich person.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
So we have an infinite amount of wealth and it comes from where and is available to whom?
The FED is one of the main tools for earning those big bucks is it not?
If it were finite, and being that we have used currency in one form or another for our recorded history, we would have run out of it by now. Wealth is constantly being created by daily human activity; saving, investing, creating, etc.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
All backed by.....
NOTHING.
It's nothing more than an algorithm that moves at inconceivable speed - and if there were a run on the banks....
fiat currency is disgraceful, fake, and nothing more than 'ink on paper.' Or rather 'binary digits in a program'.