It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Here's the Right's Political Hero; Showing His True Colors

page: 5
25
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfens

originally posted by: manna2 Btw, nobody in any part of vegas do they hang out on the front porch.


I thought it was always sunny and seventy in the desert? As for the cotton picking, I never knew that was a crop that thrived in the desert, or that it's even a legitimate job opportunity anywhere. Something does sound fishy.


THATS IT!!!
You nailed it.
it used to be a crop in these valleys....... 40 years ago. Any bets this is something that was said many decades ago?

THAT THIS ARTICLE IS A HODGE PODGE of out of context claims and statements that occured over decades




posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 05:29 PM
link   
Bundy's Rebuttal....

here's the Alex Jones / Bundy interview...

(April 24, 2014)
Cliven Bundy Responds To New York Times Racism Report





posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 05:55 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Gee... that sure sounds better. Good thing we got that cleared up.




posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 06:12 PM
link   


Infowars interview.



posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 06:16 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Wait ...in his rebuttal he 'wonders' if it wasn't better to be a slave? Wow. I can't believe his ignorance.



posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: willcallzzzzz

Cliven Bundy is 100% correct in his assessment. An impartial viewing of the Manning video that the link refers to will attest to that - in spades.
edit on 24-4-2014 by willcallzzzzz because: none



posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 08:19 PM
link   
So, we've come to a time and place in America where holding a view deemed politically incorrect and making the mistake of voicing it is grounds for having the federal government confiscate your property?

That seems to be the gist.

Because some people don't like that Bundy stood up to the Feds. I don't have to like everything he personally believes to think that Feds still acted inappropriately and think that I'd still stand more with Bundy than with the power of the police state and its jack boots.



posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 08:35 PM
link   
a reply to: BritofTexas

Interesting. I hadn't seen that video. Looked for a longer clip, couldn't seem to find one. Would like to see what was fully said. Looked online, and could only find the 20 second vid you posted and this 'transcript':




MACK: “It was a tactical plot that I was trying to get them to use,” Mack said. “But tactically speaking, if they’re going to start killing people, I’m sorry, but to show the world how ruthless these people are, women needed to be the first ones shot.” “I’m sorry, that sounds horrible,” he continued. “I would have put my own wife or daughters there, and I would have been screaming bloody murder to watch them die. I would gone next, I would have been the next one to be killed. I’m not afraid to die here. I’m willing to die here.” “But the best ploy would be to have had women at the front. Because, one, I don’t think they would have shot them. And, two, if they had, it would have been the worst thing that we could have shown to the rest of the world, that these ruthless cowards hired by the federal government will do anything.” ~Militia Leader Richard Mack


Pretty sure they were trying to make a point. Also pretty sure there wouldn't have been a moments hesitation from the ladies. Not so sure why people feel like women can't give their lives for a cause they believe in. Smacks of sexism.

IF this had happened, I'm not sure what difference it would have made, who was shot first, for the people being shot. It was a poor point to make, for Mack, and a poorer point for aggresives to use, to attack this thing.

It would have done exactly what he wanted it to do, shock the World (well, not me, anyways) that the fed would shoot into a crowd of women. I don't separate people based on gender, at least when it comes to death. The death of any, is cause for sadness (and for some, joy). So things like this wouldn't have that much effect on me, but I could see how it would affect the everyman on the street!

In the end, I am not sure whether it was a spirited attempt to resist (what they perceived to be) tyranny, or whether it was all a ploy for attention. Probably both.



posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: PrinceOfEarth


Here is the full one.



posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 10:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Chronogoblin

Here is mack admitting he was full of it, attention whore who had nothing to do with any planning going on there, making stuff up.



posted on Apr, 24 2014 @ 11:09 PM
link   
Be sure to check out the lastest info and Exposed NYTs Hoax story, only on ATS


HOAX EXPOSED: Full Clip of Bundy’s Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Anti-Government Remarks Vs. NYTs Edit!
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Apr, 25 2014 @ 11:08 AM
link   
a reply to: MrPenny

Are you embarrassed yet by your knee-jerk reaction similar to the way the press jumped all over it without checking the full video? Did you even watch the FULL video. Methinks not. Hers a link - I tried embedding but with no success - so far.



posted on Apr, 25 2014 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chronogoblin
a reply to: BritofTexas


Pretty sure they were trying to make a point. Also pretty sure there wouldn't have been a moments hesitation from the ladies. Not so sure why people feel like women can't give their lives for a cause they believe in. Smacks of sexism.


Very true indeed. Where are the loud topless feminists here? This is equal treatment, yet they are quiet. What we have here is a big fat feminist hypocrisy.

I am also sure that the women would have had no problem. Why were they there? To protest the government's actions. They were there of their own accord.



posted on Apr, 25 2014 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: willcallzzzzz
a reply to: MrPenny

Are you embarrassed yet by your knee-jerk reaction


In what way was my reaction "knee-jerk"?



posted on Apr, 25 2014 @ 06:54 PM
link   
In order to comprehend the true value of Cliven Bundy this video is a must see. The slimy progressive liberals will go to any lengths to smear Bundy or any other American patriot. Pastor Manning clearly refutes the awful rhetoric spewed from the 'presses' of the socialist leaning ultra liberal NYT, the WaPo, and other socialist media outlets with respect to their awful diatribe against the good American hero - Cliven Bundy.

On Cliven Bundy Picking Cotton: Properly understood




posted on Apr, 27 2014 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Yes. Thank you so much for this. I know Mr. Bundy is old, but I don't think he was around to witness their slavery.

If so, he would not say the same thing over and over and over again "I'm wonderin' if they weren't better off".



posted on Apr, 27 2014 @ 10:52 PM
link   
a reply to: MrPenny

I didn't realize that an out of control Federal Government was a "right wing" issue. Or is that simply because it's "your guy" in the oval office?

I would first suggest you watch the entire Bundy video. You make think differently about the man. Regardless, let's say he is a racist. A raving, lunatic evil f**king racist. Does that somehow mean that the Federal Government is justified in sending out three SWAT teams to intimidate a rancher over a tax dispute? Or shooting his cattle? What happened to the days where the government simply issued a lien?

If Bundy is a racist, then I condemn his racist beliefs. But to think that has anything to do with this dispute and the behavior of the federal government illustrates clearly how incapable you are of looking at this situation clearly.

You were played along with god knows how many other millions in this country. All of you watching this play out, wondering if maybe the government took a step to far and the bam; The NY Times reveals for all to see that the man at the center of this is racist. All of you dripping with anticipation for your chance to stand up with self-righteous indignation and moral superiority and denounce the man who for a split second, caused you to wonder if perhaps the government is something to be carefully watched even when it's "your guy" in office.

Bundy's racial beliefs have nothing to do with this issue. The inability of you and your ilk to be Americans first and Obamabots second has everything to do with this issue.



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 04:38 AM
link   
a reply to: willcallzzzzz

Pastor Manning again? The man's a nutcase!



www.youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 08:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: niteandgrey
a reply to: MrPenny

Does that somehow mean that the Federal Government is justified in sending out three SWAT teams to intimidate a rancher over a tax dispute? Or shooting his cattle? What happened to the days where the government simply issued a lien?


This kind of tunnel-vision blather shouldn't even justify a response, nonetheless.....

Please widen the tunnel through which you are fed your opinion;

1. The question asked has no bearing on what happened on BLM land. The government is justified in sending appropriately armed officers when armed civilians are present and have shown a desire to disrupt the actions of law enforcement officers. You have the 'cause and effect' backwards. It is also not purely a "tax dispute". You appear to be woefully ignorant of the facts in the matter.

2. The BLM admits to euthanizing two bulls. There is generally some loss of inventory during a widespread roundup. Do you have any information that the admitted loss of two bulls is anomalous?

3. A lien against Bundy's cattle results in Bundy simply not branding the cattle. The government has been issuing court orders against Bundy for two decades. Regardless, cattle do not read liens nor are they subject to subpoenas; they could not voluntarily leave the BLM land; and the entire kerfuffle revolved around too many cattle on land for which the use had not been paid.

Please turn off the Fox news, visit some different web sites, and widen the lens on your "tunnel vision viewer".



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 03:24 PM
link   
I think it's interesting that people always discredit a video they don't believe by stating that they feel it's "Fake" or "CGI or photoshopped" but they'll go ahead and take words by a supposed racist on video at face value not thinking at all it could have been edited. Anyway the OP's view on this proves to me that having a political mind is an understatement..There's no hope for ignorance it seems to be an untreated disease when your clearly showing partisanship for your party, not realizing that both parties are corrupt. We have to keep going with this over and over and over again. Like some one else mentioned with Harry Reid..this i believe is a distraction from the fact that land is being confiscated to give to China because after all how do you pay back 16 trillion? with land. Also i agree it's character assassination to say that if your for the RIGHT your racist and a terrorist and should have your land taken away because of one person...we must be really stupid like we didn't notice that...please.



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join