It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: flyandi
I still believe that it exactly happened like this captain described it on Google Plus a couple days after the disappearance:
plus.google.com...
....
originally posted by: Danbones
i heard on the radio an expert oceanographer figured the pings were whales...
well thats better then the black hole theory
originally posted by: whyamIhere
Something was broadcasting that distress signal.
Unless somebody sank the Transponders....That thing is at the bottom of the Ocean.
originally posted by: moebius
Smoldering fire killing coms and stuff, pilot turning towards closest runway, pilot passing out, CO poisoning, plane continuing to fly until fuel exhaustion.
The most plausible theory so far imho. Even though according to comments, there are closer runways than the one favored by this theory.
originally posted by: dashdespatch
a reply to: Rocker2013
If there was a fire why did they switch the transponders off and if you say the fire destroyed the transponders why not the rest of the plane, as it flew on for several hours after?
originally posted by: SixX18
I'd like to agree with this theory, but like you said, it hugged boarders of countries. BTW how do they know it's flight path again? I've been seeing the news show us "the flight path", but how did they pick up on a path if it was off radar?
Flight path I've seen has three legs:
originally posted by: SixX18
I'd like to agree with this theory, but like you said, it hugged boarders of countries. BTW how do they know it's flight path again? I've been seeing the news show us "the flight path", but how did they pick up on a path if it was off radar?
originally posted by: Psynic
As I have not found it mentioned anywhere else I would like to point out the similarities between NYC's twin World Trade Centre towers and Kuala Lumpur's twin Petronas towers.
An attack on the Petronas Towers would equate to a continuation of 9/11.
The significance of such a directly comparable terrorist target existing within immediate range of MH370 should not be disregarded.
An attempt to repeat such an attack could result in the aircraft being shot down by one of several airforces in the region.
Short of actually bringing down the Petronas towers, simply causing the plane to crash could be construed as a Jihadist victory.
The only way to neutralize terrorists benefitting from such a suicide mission is to deny the event ever took place.
originally posted by: djz3ro
So in it's wild, uncontrolled flight the plane stayed at an altitude between two commonly used for flights and hugged the borders between countries, looking like it was trying to avoid being detected?
“The thought of it landing somewhere else is not impossible, as we have not found a single debris that could be linked to MH370. However, the possibility of a specific country hiding the plane when more than 20 nations are searching for it, seems absurd,” the sources said.
- See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
In the wake of multiple "copycat" hijackings in 1972 the FAA required that all Boeing 727 aircraft be fitted with a device, later dubbed the "Cooper vane", which prevented lowering of the aft airstair during flight. Several airlines elected to abandon use of the airstair entirely, and simply welded the aft doors of their 727s shut.
A less-well-known modification mandated as a direct result of the hijacking was the installation of peepholes in all cockpit doors, making it possible for the cockpit crew to observe events in the passenger cabin with the cockpit door closed.