It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I've heard people say this, but I don't think the evidence supports this claim. Most sources seem to think after the transponder was turned off, the plane turned west, and didn't avoid radar at all but was picked up on Malaysia's military radar. If they wanted to avoid radar they would have turned East instead of West.
originally posted by: daaskapital
We know the plane was deliberately flying in such a way as to avoid radars.
Sometimes you find things in the last place you look.
why don't you tell us about the distress signal since you are the only person so far I have seen mention, in any way, that the people searching for this plane received a distress signal from the bottom of the ocean? There were pings, that isn't a distress signal, it's a beacon...
originally posted by: whyamIhere
Something was broadcasting that distress signal.
originally posted by: sy.gunson
You forgot to mention:
Nameless Unidentified
Sources Claim....
However I would choose to use the term vile cretins with nor regard for the hurt their lies have caused the families of those lost on MH370
originally posted by: daaskapital
I'm sure reputable news sites wouldn't publish random claims from people who are uninvolved in the investigations.
Generally, when sources close to a matter want to speak to the media, they will request anonymity for obvious reasons.
originally posted by: daaskapital
originally posted by: Bilk22
a reply to: daaskapital
It landed in China.
I was thinking Diego Garcia, personally, lol.
originally posted by: Bilk22
Well I've been saying it landed in China since someone in China tweeted that the day it went missing. Where else would it be? Why would they tweet such a thing? It was well before all the nonsense started.
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I have tended toward the possibility of it having landed somewhere for a while now. Whatever happened to that plane, it was no accident, mechanical failure, or unfortunate error. Even if it crashed somewhere, it did so on purpose, for reasons unknown right now.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
I've heard people say this, but I don't think the evidence supports this claim. Most sources seem to think after the transponder was turned off, the plane turned west, and didn't avoid radar at all but was picked up on Malaysia's military radar. If they wanted to avoid radar they would have turned East instead of West.
originally posted by: daaskapital
We know the plane was deliberately flying in such a way as to avoid radars.
No, you always find something in the last place you look, only an idiot would keep looking after they find what they're looking for...
originally posted by: ArbitrageurSometimes you find things in the last place you look.
originally posted by: [post=17832104]
In other words,you're pretty much saying it's a conspiracy.
Department of Civil Aviation director-general Datuk Azharuddin Abdul Rahman told the New Straits Times that the MoU only involved the two nations and it was in accordance with the International Civil Aviation Organisation's ruling which underscored the jurisdiction of Malaysia and Australia in this case. Details of the MoU will not be made public.
originally posted by: nightstalker78
In other words,you're pretty much saying it's a conspiracy.
Yet you provide not one shred of evidence.
Except what you THINK happened.
No way it could've accidently crashed or had a crazy pilot who wanted to end his life.
Nooo,because mental illness is made up to,right?