Obama Declassifies Antigravity Technology

page: 3
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 6 2014 @ 01:47 PM
link   
a reply to: R0CR13

There's no independent experimental confirmation of any of the T.T. Brown stuff.

It would have been seen somewhere else a long time ago: high voltage capacitors are not unknown to engineering.




posted on May, 19 2014 @ 07:58 AM
link   
.

a reply to: mbkennel

Wrong .



reference the 1:20 mark


.



posted on May, 24 2014 @ 01:32 AM
link   
Anti-gravity

Levitation by Electromagnetic Induction

www.youtube.com...
An alternating current is passed through a metal coil creating an opposing magnetic field in the plate which results in its levitation. The current is strong enough to light any bulbs that come close enough to the plate, while excess energy is dissipated as heat.


Acoustic Frequency Levitation
www.youtube.com...

The levitator consists of two small speakers, one above the other, which generate sound waves at frequencies of about 22 kilohertz - slightly higher than humans can hear. When the sound waves from the top and bottom speakers are aligned they create a standing wave. At the nodes of this wave there is no net transfer of energy and pressure from the sound waves cancels the effect of gravity on light objects like these drops.






Piezoelectric Quartz

www.youtube.com...

Piezoelectric crystals can produce electricity from the energy generated by movement. A common example is a cigarette lighter, where the crystals produce a spark.
Fuel from Seawater


Extracting CO2 from seawater turns out to be surprisingly easy, using a new method called bipolar membrane electrodialysis.

www.youtube.com...

Chemistry
A paper from the Naval Research Lab (Willauer et. al. 2010) outlines the process. Seawater is broken into hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis; the oxygen is vented off and the hydrogen is retained. At the same time, CO2 is captured from a much larger volume of seawater. The CO2 is converted to carbon monoxide at first, then to hydrocarbons through the Fischer-Tropsch process. Chemically it looks like this:
34 H2O → 34 H2 + 17 O2 (Electrolysis)
11 CO2 + 11 H2 → 11 CO + 11 H2O (Reverse water gas shift)
11 CO + 23 H2 → C11H24 + 11 H2O (Fischer-Tropsch)
Combined, the process sums to:
11 CO2 + 12 H2O → C11H24 + 17 O2
That C11H24 you get at the end is the jet fuel.






Put em' together and what do ya got?

Ancient Images


"As above, so below"
Modern Vimaana
View Image




"In religion and politics, people's belief's and convictions are in almost every case gotten-at second hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue, but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass-farthing." Mark Twain

Piezoelectric, Tire, Road System, Water Electrolysis Based Fuel Battery System
Future Concept
edit on 24-5-2014 by nickendres because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2014 @ 01:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: brazenalderpadrescorpio
a reply to: Zaphod58

What evidence do you have that something such as antigravity technology doesn't exist?


Isnt that sort of like saying what proof do you have that pink elephants dont exist? The only proof you would have is no one ever saw one.



posted on May, 24 2014 @ 01:48 AM
link   
exactly, there is the science.



posted on May, 24 2014 @ 01:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: R0CR13
.

a reply to: mbkennel

Wrong .



reference the 1:20 mark


.


Hes describing something thats in common use here have a look.

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 03:11 AM
link   
Hi All:

As this is my first post hopefully it goes without too much ridicule or discontent. I'm simply a lonely surveyor content with watching disclosure happen from giants shoulders (Zaphod58). I hope I haven't crossed established lines with asking this question, as I didn't spend much time reading the user agreement page. If I have made transgressions please feel free to flame on. I will learn from my mistakes.

"What if we've (homo-sapiens) been developing aerial platforms that don't negate gravity so much as mass"? Would mass reduction of any vehicle reduce inertial constraints on the platform and possible occupant/occupants? Would the theorized mass reduction of said craft have to fall between ~0 and ~20% of Newtonian mass to make any difference? Does anyone happen to know the mass differential equations associated with this idea?

Anyways, just a layman's thought; I literally have no idea what I'm talking about.... Seriously.





new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join