 |
|
Topic started on 27-11-2004 @ 06:26 PM by kyateLaBoca
|
I just felt it was important to start this thread up. There are a lot of UFO pics floating around and was wondering how good can someone make a clear
looking fake or a blurry looking fake UFO picture. I've seen many convincing fakes and later found out that they were fakes.
So heres my challenge to you photo shop experts/hoaxers. Lets see how good you can come up with a fake and post it here on ATS. It can be a fake you
created for this thread or a fake you created in the past. It can be a clear UFO picture fake or a blurry UFO and we'll determine how convincing it
looks. I'm sure some hoaxers have probably posted fakes here on ATS and have convinced many. I'd like to see those again.
And if you want to go all out, you can make a video fake or post your old video fakes. I'd like to see one of those.
Or if you want, you can send your fakes in to coast to coast and see which one of our ATS pics is selected to be posted
I only ask for one thing NO BASHING OTHER PEOPLES WORK. Criticisms are cool
[edit on 27-11-2004 by kyateLaBoca]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 06:41 PM by NetStorm
|
First, I am not in the habit of posting fake pics, but for this experiment here we go.
Fake? OR UFO...if fake...what is it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 06:45 PM by spacedoubt
|
Brilliant!
Post a known fake. Try to figure out technique.
I like the idea..
I'll be sending some up over the next few days..
Netstorm,
Spotlight on Fog?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 06:47 PM by Striker122
|
the pic above is fake...it doesn't even look real.
[edit on 27-11-2004 by Striker122]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 06:48 PM by NetStorm
|
Originally posted by Striker122
I think the pic above is fake...it doesn't even look real. 
Well it's a picture of something or you would not be seeing it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 06:52 PM by kyateLaBoca
|
Netstorm...good work
I think it would be a lot more convincing if you can put a few stars in the background or make it look like it was night time, and maybe reduce the
glare of the spaceship to a certain extent.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 06:54 PM by spacedoubt
|
SLightly overexposed eye of alligator, taken at night?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 06:55 PM by NetStorm
|
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
Netstorm...good work
I think it would be a lot more convincing if you can put a few stars in the background or make it look like it was night time, and maybe reduce the
glare of the spaceship to a certain extent. 
I wouldn't call it good work(though I appreciate the thumbs up)...took me 15 seconds to take the pic...it just has the "shape" so I posted it
without playing around with the pic, except for resizing it.
BTW Callate La Boca....I love the way you spelled it
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:06 PM by spacedoubt
|
How about this one?
no enhancements whatsoever
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:07 PM by Notme
|
Can they be well known (Fake) pics from other sources ( not our own work ) as well as our own stuff?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:10 PM by Notme
|
Originally posted by spacedoubt
How about this one?
no enhancements whatsoever

Commet with camera moved left to right? (And staying focused on trees)
Clouds blur the same, but trees are ok.
??
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:10 PM by kyateLaBoca
|
Originally posted by Notme
Can they be well known (Fake) pics from other sources ( not our own work ) as well as our own stuff? 
Sure...why not?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:12 PM by spacedoubt
|
Notme,
not a comet, camera did not move. It was a long shutter speed.
And I knew exactly WHEN to open the shutter..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:31 PM by jazzgul
|
what abouT this???
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:36 PM by Huria86
|
Is the first one a lamp? It looks like a lamp
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 07:40 PM by Notme
|
Is going to get very interesting.
Will prob turn out to be a lesson in photography and photoshop
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 10:11 PM by Kata
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-11-2004 @ 10:31 PM by diehard_democrat
|
 How about this one?
no enhancements whatsoever

It's a meteor. Don't Google it, because all that shows up is junk like computer generated conceptions of meteors, and jets, the usual.
[Edit: link to image]
[edit on 11/27/04 by diehard_democrat]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-11-2004 @ 03:54 AM by kyateLaBoca
|
This one is a good one...did you make this one up or did you find it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-11-2004 @ 04:29 AM by spacedoubt
|
Diehard Democrat,
Nope, not a meteor.
hint: I knew exactly when to open the shutter..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |