It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Obama suggests in his books that he used marijuana and "blow" to ease the pain of his ongoing struggle to define his racial identity, and that association makes it all but unthinkable that even the most ruthless political operative would attempt to make an issue of long-ago substance abuse.
A prominent member of Chicago’s homosexual community claims Barack Obama’s participation in the “gay” bar and bathhouse scene was so well known that many who were aware of his lifestyle were shocked when he ran for president and finally won the White House.
"He always portrayed himself as a foreign student," Pope said. "Girls were never anything that he ever was interested in ... He would get with these older white gay men, and this is how we just pretty much had the impression that that's how he was procuring his coc aine."
She then notes, "In other words, he was having sex with these older white guys and that's how he was getting this coc aine to be able to freebase."
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: freakjive
Right, so what does any of that have to with a person's ability to lead a country? Especially an unfounded rumor by a former classmate. Heck, knowing the proliferation of coc aine in the 80's and 90's, I'd say that it is probably a GREAT drug to take and lead while high with. It keeps you awake on long nights, keeps you focused, makes you aggressive (great leadership attribute), loosens your lips so it is easier to speak on things, and those are a few of the things of the top of my head that would be beneficial to a leader.
Though you still need to prove that he is still using. As for the homosexual thing, that is just ridiculous. I could care less about some rumor and not to mention, being gay doesn't immediately make you a terrible leader. The comparison made between Obama and Putin listed a bunch of irrelevant points (and maybe one good one with the constitution burning one) about Obama and then listed relevant points about Putin. It's obvious that Obama is a weak leader, so why couldn't the poster list actual relevant things that outline his terrible leadership abilities, like being wishy-washy about Syria, administration full of lies, cannot keep a lid on whistle blowers, shuts down valid arguments with the race card, history in Chicago politics (Chicago is one of the most notoriously corrupt cities in the country), feel good politics?
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: freakjive
Classic, you make ungrounded and baseless accusations against one leader in an attempt to smear him (as if being Gay is a problem - unless you're a Russian and fear for your "masculinity") and then, when challenged on it, you back away citing "off topic" and T&C's.
FYI, it isn't against the T&C's - it is only against them for discussing personal drug use. Unless you are Obama... Are you?
Please be advise that the USA does not owe $17tr and that it just has a share in the debt, technical detail I know but i thought I had better warn you before someone here jumps on it.