It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
originally posted by: InTheLight
Yet, there is no proof this one woman was a radical feminist or any type of feminist, because the author of this thread didn't bother to start a dialogue with her but chose to let the door close on her while she was mid-way through.
We cannot know for sure, but her response suggests that she is likely to have been influenced by radical feminist ideology. Associating one man's attempted act of politeness with trying to instill the ideals of Patriarchy is ridiculous. I agree that the author could have handled the situation better, but that does not discount the substance of the OP.
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
a reply to: InTheLight
Then I'm afraid you have failed to grasp the deeper meaning behind the post.
This is not about some guy letting a door slam on some woman because she made a snide remark. It's more about an example of a certain type of mindset that associates all men with Patriarchy and the oppression of women.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
a reply to: InTheLight
Then I'm afraid you have failed to grasp the deeper meaning behind the post.
This is not about some guy letting a door slam on some woman because she made a snide remark. It's more about an example of a certain type of mindset that associates all men with Patriarchy and the oppression of women.
I as well as others here are grasping deeper meanings from the OPs actions and jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions and then starting a feminism bashing thread (as per usual)...another certain type of mindset that associates all women that don't consider themselves helpless or at a loss without a man that they 'must' be radical feminists. (LOLing really out loud).
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
a reply to: InTheLight
Then I'm afraid you have failed to grasp the deeper meaning behind the post.
This is not about some guy letting a door slam on some woman because she made a snide remark. It's more about an example of a certain type of mindset that associates all men with Patriarchy and the oppression of women.
I as well as others here are grasping deeper meanings from the OPs actions and jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions and then starting a feminism bashing thread (as per usual)...another certain type of mindset that associates all women that don't consider themselves helpless or at a loss without a man that they 'must' be radical feminists. (LOLing really out loud).
Don't ya love it?
And were attracted to weak men too, didn't you know?
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
a reply to: InTheLight
Then I'm afraid you have failed to grasp the deeper meaning behind the post.
This is not about some guy letting a door slam on some woman because she made a snide remark. It's more about an example of a certain type of mindset that associates all men with Patriarchy and the oppression of women.
I as well as others here are grasping deeper meanings from the OPs actions and jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions and then starting a feminism bashing thread (as per usual)...another certain type of mindset that associates all women that don't consider themselves helpless or at a loss without a man that they 'must' be radical feminists. (LOLing really out loud).
Don't ya love it?
And were attracted to weak men too, didn't you know?
I only know - through actual life's experience - that weak men have always been attracted to me. Does that make me 'I am the matriarchy'?
Yet, there is no proof this one woman was a radical feminist or any type of feminist, because the author of this thread didn't bother to start a dialogue with her but chose to let the door close on her while she was mid-way through.
I as well as others here are grasping deeper meanings from the OPs actions and jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions and then starting a feminism bashing thread (as per usual)...another certain type of mindset that associates all women that don't consider themselves helpless or at a loss without a man that they 'must' be radical feminists. (LOLing really out loud).
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Yet, there is no proof this one woman was a radical feminist or any type of feminist, because the author of this thread didn't bother to start a dialogue with her but chose to let the door close on her while she was mid-way through.
There was plenty of proof. But then again you wouldn't want to be denying other people's experiences would you?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: InTheLight
I as well as others here are grasping deeper meanings from the OPs actions and jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions and then starting a feminism bashing thread (as per usual)...another certain type of mindset that associates all women that don't consider themselves helpless or at a loss without a man that they 'must' be radical feminists. (LOLing really out loud).
It's you associating all women and all men into your grossly generalized categories.
I'll ask this again because I've never had an answer yet.
What rights do I have that you do not?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: BDBinc
You should get out more. Go tell a victim of assault or abuse what you think violence is, and they'll likely laugh at you. And then make up another story so you can convince yourself you are right.
Nope to both your statement and question, I am only trying to help deny ignorance.
ignorance |ˈignərəns|
noun
lack of knowledge or information
Neither have I from you...my standing question is 'Why did you not explain yourself as a friendly, helpful person to all people to the woman, instead of reacting with indignation and letting the door close on her while she was half-way into the door when she voiced her preference not to be assisted by you?'
As well if by chance she was a feminist (but we'll never know) why would you not respond with "More power to you" or "I meant no offence, you are heavily loaded and I'm just a helpful person"?
I have told a victim of assault and abuse about your actions and they did not find shutting a human being in a door funny, so its just you (and other troubled individuals) that are amused by shutting a person in a door .
Intentionally shutting someone in the door is an act of violence against a person.
In the story you told this woman that you shut in the door was not a 'feminist' she never told you " I am a 'feminist'" you just labeled her.
To me your thread just read of "LM's interpersonal reactions(and relations) with this one woman ( who exhibited disapproval towards you ) “.
violence |ˈvī(ə)ləns|
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
• strength of emotion or an unpleasant or destructive natural force: the violence of her own feelings.
• Law the unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Annee
I consider myself a [Feminist]. I support equality for women.
Hopefully you support equality for men as well.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: InTheLight
Trying to make me out to be evil and shaming me is pretty low, especially from someone who is basically claiming herself to be morally superior, and will not help you avoid the question. This seems a common feminist tactic. I guess if reason fails, it's time to resort to the fallacy.
I'm not going to read your links. You have your own mind and can use it.
What rights do I have as a man, do you not have as a woman?
We can talk about this inequality you've been pushing if you can at least back up your dogma.