It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JonButtonIII
Here's the thing everyone should remember: Scalia is a mouthpiece of the establishment.
TPTB WANT a violent uprising, because that they know exactly how to handle.
What we need to give them is the kind of "revolt" they're totally unprepared to handle. Nonviolent nonparticipation is the answer. No major uprising, no violence, no destruction of property, no chaos from which they can form "order"--just a concerted show of silent noncompliance by we the people.
Look at what happened in Conn. and NY when registration time came for those new guns laws. That's right, NOTHING. People just quietly and peacefully ignored the feds. And in so doing, the people gave the government the biggest "eff you" it's received in a long long time.
And what was the government's answer? Nothing.
So yeah, a violent revolt the government is happy to handle. But peaceful nonparticipation... that, no corrupt government on earth has been able to long withstand.
originally posted by: JonButtonIII
Here's the thing everyone should remember: Scalia is a mouthpiece of the establishment.
TPTB WANT a violent uprising, because that they know exactly how to handle.
What we need to give them is the kind of "revolt" they're totally unprepared to handle. Nonviolent nonparticipation is the answer. No major uprising, no violence, no destruction of property, no chaos from which they can form "order"--just a concerted show of silent noncompliance by we the people.
Look at what happened in Conn. and NY when registration time came for those new guns laws. That's right, NOTHING. People just quietly and peacefully ignored the feds. And in so doing, the people gave the government the biggest "eff you" it's received in a long long time.
And what was the government's answer? Nothing.
So yeah, a violent revolt the government is happy to handle. But peaceful nonparticipation... that, no corrupt government on earth has been able to long withstand.
originally posted by: The Vagabond
a reply to: greencmp
So, did one of the people who is supposed to be protecting us from abuses of our rights just say "you're on your own"
Or did he just say it would be understandable to take up arms over a financial burden that was not a violation of our rights?
originally posted by: greencmp
That is what I meant by statists reading into it and why I specified peaceful civil revolt against excessive taxation and poor stewardship of public resources.
Star anyway but, Scalia is no mouth piece for the administration though, I can't exactly deny that he is a member of the powers that be since he is a supreme court justice.
originally posted by: WCmutant
a reply to: greencmp
I believe the words are being misused. A "revolt" by definition is NOT peaceful and civil. And something tells me that Scalia was referencing 1776 revolution "revolt" and not exactly suggesting a peaceful, civil revolt... which sounds like an oxymoron.
Based on the full article, I'd even further assume that he meant 1776 revolution and not peaceful/civil. But without actually asking him for clarification, we can only sit here and guess.