It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: LightningStrikesHere
Really? Show me where he admitted being the bomber? YOU CAN'T !
Don't link me some MSM "HE ADMITTED IT" hog wash . if he did admit to the bombing why is he still awaiting trial?
Hell where is the kid even at ?
Okay, try to think about this.
If he didn't confess to his involvement and sign a confession with the authorities, don't you think this will come out in court?
Why would the authorities lie, knowing that there would be a court case and that their deception would be revealed? How on Earth does this delusion make sense to you?
It makes absolutely no logical sense that the authorities would "manufacture" a confession knowing that this would be utterly destroyed in court and potentially make them all guilty of a conspiracy, and destroy any case they have against him.
Even if we go with your belief of his innocence for one moment, what would be the point in falsifying a confession? Who wins from that? No one. It's still going to court, and their deception would still be exposed for all to see, losing them the case, losing them their jobs and likely ending up with them in prison too.
Don't you understand the completely illogical suggestion you're making? However you look at this, the notion of a manufactured confession holds absolutely no water at all. It make no sense.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
...What do you think the motive would be for the federal gov't to set up these two people for a mass murder charge? What would the goal be? And do you think that goal was achieved?
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: WanDash
"Are you aware of what kind of 'shrapnel damage' was incurred by the vehicles, picket fences, houses, cops, witnesses...from this "bomb"? " ...
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: WanDash
Damage on that residential street? You see what I can see. ...
Because you are innocent until proven guilty, the prosecution must prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In other words, once all of the evidence against you is considered, no reasonable person should be able to question your guilt-otherwise, you cannot be found guilty. You also cannot be charged with the same crime twice.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: WanDash
What convinced me was seeing at least one of them from an overhead perspective, instead of that really chaotic video that had been going around just before these were made known, way back while this was an immediate story. I'm really surprised everyone wasn't familiar with these, as they'd also been the topic of a couple threads here at ATS. Pretty big news back then. ...
if you wouldn’t mind refrain from demeaning those that are not yet satisfied with the same conclusion. It doesn’t mean that we will never be convinced… It simply means that your standard of proof and ours’ are not the same.
The point is... very bad people exist. People who kill and think nothing more of it. Probably a million or more of them, by stats and conviction rates of multi-strike predators, documented as such.