a reply to: Wrabbit2000
Here’s the problem I have with the tacit – “They’re low-life scum, and deserve the lowest hell imaginable.”
Given the information available to us…there are Numerous plausible
explanations for them being involved…but…either innocent or set-up.
For me, there are two questions that lean toward their involvement.
– After the bombing…did Dzhokhar mention to any of his friends or acquaintances that he was “RIGHT THERE!”?
If not…and he had NOTHING to do with planting the bomb…there is virtually no explanation (that fits within the realms of normal
) for his silence on the matter.
If, on the other hand, he had something to do with it, but was ‘innocent’ of the evil intent…there might be some wiggle room for innocence.
And if…he did tell one or more of his acquaintances that he was “F***ing Right There!”… It would nullify this question…
– Did he write the note in the boat…or not? If he did – I think the question of innocence or guilt is obvious.
In each case, however – there is still the question of ‘how’ they prepared for this.
They would certainly have needed/wanted to test the homemade bomb/s & ‘method of detonation’ at least, once…
Where did they do this?
If they did not do a test-run… WHO gave the bomb/s and detonators to them?
Or – was there another party at the Marathon…who detonated the devices (to guarantee ‘line of sight’ would suggest an elevated
To plan on ‘line of sight’ in/during the Marathon event…at street level…would be (imo
) ‘iffy’, at best…if they
cared to be spared of the blast/s.
If, though, they were informed that they were playing a role in an FBI/DHS drill…and “There will be hundreds of participants at the
event…looking for you and trying to identify you before/when you set the ‘dummy-bombs’ down…so…you MUST maintain your cool! …and… if
they don’t identify you on the day of the Event…keep your cool, because ‘finding’ the ‘bombers’ will be an ongoing event until they find
you, or…give up”… …the door for plausible innocence
…gets a couple of nudges.
Anyway – I have no problem with you or anyone-else concluding, on the evidence that is currently in the public domain, that the brothers are/were
I am simply ‘still’ pestered by too many questions to arrive at such a Judgment, without an uncoerced confession.
So – thanks for letting us know that you’re satisfied with the information you’ve presented for your case – but, please (if you
) refrain from demeaning those that are not yet satisfied with the same conclusion. It doesn’t mean that we will never be
convinced… It simply means that your standard of proof and ours’ are not the same.
edit on 4/20/2014 by WanDash because: Reply functionality
edit on 4/20/2014 by WanDash because: parenthetical