It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't reject the blood of Christ, just things people make up about it.
You reject the blood of Christ, therefore for you, there is no other sacrifice. I only wish you could perceive your own inconsistencies.
Believe that Jesus died for your sins and be saved or hold your peace, . . .
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: BELIEVERpriestI don't reject the blood of Christ, just things people make up about it.
You reject the blood of Christ, therefore for you, there is no other sacrifice. I only wish you could perceive your own inconsistencies.
Believe that Jesus died for your sins and be saved or hold your peace, . . .
I do believe that Jesus died for the sins of the world as the Bible says.
I am saved in the biblical sense, rather than in the modern pop-culture religion sense of "saved".
You created a discussion thread and started out by saying that it is cult doctrine.
I'm just pointing out how that doesn't mesh with normal theology.
Some pretty weird pseudo logic to arrive at that conclusion.
And now that you have rejected the Jewish messiah and grabbed a Greek one
Separate but equal, with one having priority over the other.
And what Believerpriest is saying is that in God's eyes, there is no Greek or Jew because both are equal.
No.
Do you suppose it had anything to do with Greeks who still followed and infused Greek mythology to make it mesh with a thousand years of Jewish scripture and literature?
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: WarminIndySome pretty weird pseudo logic to arrive at that conclusion.
And now that you have rejected the Jewish messiah and grabbed a Greek one
I'm guessing that you didn't look up oracles in a Bible commentary but instead went to Google and found something completely unrelated.
I do notice that you have a tendency to post complete fabrications of what I supposedly think.
But given that you haven't received the Jewish identity of the Jewish messiah because you fail to recognize the Jewish identity of ancient scriptures much older than the commentaries and writings of Augustine . . .
This is a good example of what I was calling pseudo-logic.
. . . then I am going to have to conclude one thing, that through struggling to maintain Greek identity and complete Greek authorship, you have presented to us Greek mythology in the guise of Christianity by calling it normal.
That would have been at least a couple hundred years before Augustine. When there we people who lived at the time of Jesus' crucifixion.
Before Augustine took over, there was a group of Jewish Christians who felt it appropriate to still connect to Jewish identity.
Wasn't it you just a couple days ago on another thread who said that I wasn't a Christian because I didn't keep a Jewish Passover?
You might call me a Judaizer, but I am not saying you must keep the circumcision to be Christian and that's what the original argument was over.
Paul also said that if you try to keep part of the Law, then you have to keep all of it.
As you say the law is no longer in effect, what you are referring to is the Judaizers who believed that one must be circumcised and that's where the entire argument stems from. If you read it, you would know that.
If you remember, it was you telling me what day I need to keep, not the other way around.
What I am saying is this, even Paul says that you have no right to tell me what days I regard and what meats or drinks I choose to eat and I have no right to tell you that.
And . . so?
But on the other hand, nowhere does Paul ever remove Jewish identity from Jesus, ever. Jesus was, to Paul, the Jewish messiah. Simple and plain.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: WarminIndyI do notice that you have a tendency to post complete fabrications of what I supposedly think.
But given that you haven't received the Jewish identity of the Jewish messiah because you fail to recognize the Jewish identity of ancient scriptures much older than the commentaries and writings of Augustine . . .This is a good example of what I was calling pseudo-logic.
. . . then I am going to have to conclude one thing, that through struggling to maintain Greek identity and complete Greek authorship, you have presented to us Greek mythology in the guise of Christianity by calling it normal.That would have been at least a couple hundred years before Augustine. When there we people who lived at the time of Jesus' crucifixion.
Before Augustine took over, there was a group of Jewish Christians who felt it appropriate to still connect to Jewish identity.Wasn't it you just a couple days ago on another thread who said that I wasn't a Christian because I didn't keep a Jewish Passover?
You might call me a Judaizer, but I am not saying you must keep the circumcision to be Christian and that's what the original argument was over.Paul also said that if you try to keep part of the Law, then you have to keep all of it.
As you say the law is no longer in effect, what you are referring to is the Judaizers who believed that one must be circumcised and that's where the entire argument stems from. If you read it, you would know that.If you remember, it was you telling me what day I need to keep, not the other way around.
What I am saying is this, even Paul says that you have no right to tell me what days I regard and what meats or drinks I choose to eat and I have no right to tell you that.And . . so?
But on the other hand, nowhere does Paul ever remove Jewish identity from Jesus, ever. Jesus was, to Paul, the Jewish messiah. Simple and plain.
Not in those words, no.
Absolutely not did I say you weren't a Christian for not keeping Passover.
That was part of your post.
What I said was that you DO keep Passover because you take Communion, because the Christian Communion is in the third cup during the Seder.
Seventh Day Adventists celebrate communion. I am a member of my local congregation and participate in taking of the emblems of the bread and wine.
I don't know if you take Communion or not.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: WarminIndyNot in those words, no.
Absolutely not did I say you weren't a Christian for not keeping Passover.
But by implication you did, by presenting steps of logic, you claim I am actually a worshiper of Dionysus.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That was part of your post.
What I said was that you DO keep Passover because you take Communion, because the Christian Communion is in the third cup during the Seder.
Then you added later that not accepting your claimed connection nullifies the action and transforms it into a worship of the Greek gods.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Seventh Day Adventists celebrate communion. I am a member of my local congregation and participate in taking of the emblems of the bread and wine.
I don't know if you take Communion or not.
That is because the Jews believe in the Ten Commandments too.
So you keep Sabbath on Saturday, just like the Jews?
I don't share in the enthusiasm that a lot of Adventists have for Jesus coming soon to "destroy the wicked".
But some of the things you say sound nothing like Seventh Day Adventists.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: WarminIndyThat is because the Jews believe in the Ten Commandments too.
So you keep Sabbath on Saturday, just like the Jews?I don't share in the enthusiasm that a lot of Adventists have for Jesus coming soon to "destroy the wicked".
But some of the things you say sound nothing like Seventh Day Adventists.
No because it existed before Moses, according to our belief and so is not dependent on that set of laws from Moses.
And then aren't you debtor to the whole law now that you keep the Sabbath on Saturday?
All that came directly from God, and not Moses, remember? Coming in this great voice from the smoke and fire on the top of the mountain.
You just told us in several posts that by keeping one law you are debtor to the whole law. This God is your God, you are going to have no other gods before this God, don't make any graven images, don't take the name in vain, don't kill, don't dishonor your parents, don't commit adultery, no bearing false witness, don't steal and don't covet.
No because Jesus is the I Am, and we follow him, not what someone wrote about those wicked people from Egypt.
. . . then you are at some point going to have to accept every word THIS GOD says.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: WarminIndyNo because it existed before Moses, according to our belief and so is not dependent on that set of laws from Moses.
And then aren't you debtor to the whole law now that you keep the Sabbath on Saturday?
The idea is that Adam and Eve kept the Sabbath.All that came directly from God, and not Moses, remember? Coming in this great voice from the smoke and fire on the top of the mountain.
You just told us in several posts that by keeping one law you are debtor to the whole law. This God is your God, you are going to have no other gods before this God, don't make any graven images, don't take the name in vain, don't kill, don't dishonor your parents, don't commit adultery, no bearing false witness, don't steal and don't covet.No because Jesus is the I Am, and we follow him, not what someone wrote about those wicked people from Egypt.
. . . then you are at some point going to have to accept every word THIS GOD says.
They were hard hearted, as Jesus said.
We have the spirit that makes us kind hearted and do what is right without a bunch of man made regimentation.
That's just silly to think that I'm on here promoting denominational doctrine.
But for future reference, it would be nice if you continued to say "In our tradition" meaning the Millerite tradition.
Obviously all Christianity couldn't agree with any one person.
But if you say that all of Christianity agrees with you because it's "normal" Christianity, then that is wrong. Don't misrepresent what the rest of us believe.
In my opinion, everything that we know about God comes from our knowledge of Jesus.
And Jesus is the Son, not the Father. It was the I AM who said it. But this is a new one on me, a Oneness Seventh Day Adventist.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: WarminIndyObviously all Christianity couldn't agree with any one person.
But if you say that all of Christianity agrees with you because it's "normal" Christianity, then that is wrong. Don't misrepresent what the rest of us believe.
There is though a such thing as normative Christianity.
I don't think yours fits in that category since most English speaking people call Jesus, "Jesus".
Dispensationalism, which this thread was started to support is a cult, and not normal Christianity.In my opinion, everything that we know about God comes from our knowledge of Jesus.
And Jesus is the Son, not the Father. It was the I AM who said it. But this is a new one on me, a Oneness Seventh Day Adventist.
Jesus is the name of God, meaning he represents God's character.
An angel appeared to Moses in a burning bush to represent God, and to speak for Him.
Jesus speaks for God now and takes that title of I Am for himself.
For the time and place where she came out of, yes.
So Ellen G. White has a normative Christianity?
In the sense that I am not promoting here any specifically denominational doctrines.
Good that you are now saying it is your opinion.
The Christian God, which is the only real god.
But I have to ask, as I would anyone else, which god does Jesus represent?
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: WarminIndyFor the time and place where she came out of, yes.
So Ellen G. White has a normative Christianity?
I realize some people try to represent her as being weird but she wasn't someone like Joseph Smith, trying to start a whole new religion.
I think most New England Christians and the old Southern Christians probably too, believed in a Sabbath that is based on the Ten Commandments, just that to them it meant Sunday.In the sense that I am not promoting here any specifically denominational doctrines.
Good that you are now saying it is your opinion.The Christian God, which is the only real god.
But I have to ask, as I would anyone else, which god does Jesus represent?
There isn't somehow another god that I could alternatively believe in, even if someone, for example the Jews, thought theirs was a different god. I think that would be just their opinion, which in my opinion would be wrong.
Only Christians know God because He is revealed through Jesus.
By saying "the Christian God" can be any god.
Jesus is God's name.
Sure, the God of "Christians" can be any god, just insert name here.