It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MH370 missing (Part 2)

page: 7
39
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 02:03 PM
link   
I just hope the plane isn't hiding in the Middle East somewhere guarded by a bunch of terrorists.




posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: jaffo

Agreed. Not everything is a conspiracy, despite what most people on here believe. All these theories about this mystery. Some people just can't accept the fact it was a tragic accident, nothing more. Their lives are so boring and mundane, they have to create fantastical theories as to why an acceptable conclusion hasn't been reached in a short time.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:15 PM
link   
The claims now being made include that it was in Vietnamese airspace for 15-20 minutes before turning, and it climbed as high as 39,000 feet.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:16 PM
link   
from what they have told the public they really don't have anything concrete to think the plane is where they're looking. All they seem to have is a theory of the north and south corridors and they're looking at the south corridor because the north one is simply too complicated to even start thinking about how to proceed with an investigation. My theory from the beginning was that there's a cover up regarding this plane. Either it was flown deliberately to an undisclosed location for whatever reason, either Yemen, the Maldives in the indian ocean or it was shot down by China or the US.

The thing that is most interesting is that if it flew this southern route that Diego Garcia wouldn't have picked up this rouge plane on their radar. They have equipment for deep space observation there but they sit blindy in the middle of the ocean with no radar monitoring the very ocean they're in? I don't buy it now and I didn't buy it a month ago.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

If that is true than i was right



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Seriously?
You saw this in the news? where?
edit on 4~18~2014 by Aeboro because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:19 PM
link   
David Mearns is quite positive that the wreckage is found.




ONE of the world's most experienced wreck hunters believes the crash site of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 has been found and that recovering its black boxes is inevitable.

David Mearns, the director of UK-based Bluewater Recoveries said that 40 days after the Boeing 777-200ER went missing, search teams had finally found their target.

"I think essentially they have found the wreckage site," Mearns told the ABC's 7.30 program last night.

"While the government hasn't announced that yet, if somebody asked me: 'Technically, do they have enough information to say that?' My answer is unequivocally 'Yes'."


www.fijitimes.com...



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Aeboro

I was channel surfing and came across CNN, where they were talking about it.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Aeboro

I was channel surfing and came across CNN, where they were talking about it.

CNN is not a credible source. With their reporters lying about being in war zones in Libya and Anderson Cooper pretending he was at a location when he was actually using a green screen. Why would anyone believe them? CNN is just playing this story for ratings! The aircraft will never be found. It's been parted out already.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Mikeultra

So did the flight exist or not? If the plane has been "parted out" then where did it go to get parted out? And when did it go there?

Quit making wild accusations and claims, and actually prove them for a change.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Good find ;D



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Mikeultra

So did the flight exist or not? If the plane has been "parted out" then where did it go to get parted out? And when did it go there?

Quit making wild accusations and claims, and actually prove them for a change.

GA Telesis has a partnership with Air China to disassemble aircraft in Bejing, China. Perhaps the transponders were turned off, it climbed high enough to kill all the passengers, then completed it's intended flight to Bejing. It landed and went directly to the Air China hangar and was quickly torn down and shelved. China could be in a deal with Soros and Rothschild in a plot against Malaysia. I'm not sure if the pilots were involved, it could be the Boeing vulnerability to remote hacking was key to the theft of this aircraft.

GAIC is the first company in China whose core business is to maximize asset values through the teardown, disassembly, repair and sale of used aircraft, engines and components. “We offer competitively priced teardown services here,” said Mark Atkeson, General Manager of GAIC. “We have worked with CAAC, China Customs and airport authorities to facilitate our local teardown solutions.”GAIC offers part-out services in China, creating the greatest value for local airlines, MROs and lessors.
www.gatelesis.com...



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Mikeultra


Exactly, there was no flight. The Rothschild controlled Malaysian Airlines is attacking the current regime in Malaysia with this farce. That way they can install a puppet to their liking who will sign the Malaysian population into debt slavery with the IMF! My theories are quite straight, your reading comprehension is what needs work, lol. - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...&mem=Mikeultra#sthash.fpMRS0yU.dpuf


So how did they fly high enough to kill the passengers and continue the flight? According to you there WAS no flight to begin with!

You need to keep your theories straight here, and show some actual proof, and not just wild claims.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Mikeultra
But you have previously stated in Part 1, that the Rothschilds control the Malaysian Gov't's publically owned firm that invested in Malaysia Airlines. And now you are saying that they don't. Now you are saying they trashed the plane so they could share portions of their profits from a forced takeover with George Soros and China. Well which is it?

And why would the greediest people in the world give up $1 to get $.25? That makes no sense at all.

Everyday you have some new version, some new idea. It's like you have Glen Becks chalk board or something.






PS- I think this jaffo guy is my genetic twin.

edit on 18-4-2014 by OatDelphi because: wording



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 05:52 PM
link   
Can a plane switch its identity (Hex code & Registration Number) while in flight? and would another flight number that had just shown up on radar, be deemed as susspect? another words could 370 after switching off the transponder(making the plane invisible) then switch it back on but broadcasting a different identity? surely if this was possible it would be able to fly un-challenged then by ATC.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 05:55 PM
link   
a reply to: UKGuy1805

Theoretically they could (I'm not sure about realistically), but if they didn't have a flight plan, with clearances for crossing the borders it would be pretty suspicious.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 06:01 PM
link   
If the plane had been intended to be used to either ferry a weapon(nuke aka the missing ones) or be used as a weapon itself, say it was a False Flag involving high level operatives who somehow got the plane to skillfully change heading, say after loosing transponder contact, but after a short while flying (masked) it re appeared but after changing its transponder ID and showing a different flight number/Hex code-Registration etc.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58



Are all flights recorded with ATC? another words would it look susspect if a repatition of an exsisting flight crossed through boundaries say some hours after the same flight had gone before, say for EG if a USA 215 flight had flown a similar route earlier, then say 370 was made to mimmic USA 215 and fly some hors later, if a change over of ATC had occured would they think the USA 215 flight was susspect, especily if they were told about 370.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 06:11 PM
link   
a reply to: UKGuy1805

All ATC information is recorded in case of an investigation. I'm not sure how long they keep them on record, but they're all recorded.



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 06:31 PM
link   
IMARSAT was still tracking a plane with the correct sat comm equipment serial number. That would have to be taking into account.



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join