It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Skyfloating
This Putin guy puts my non-interventionist principles into doubt.
MessageforAll
reply to post by butcherguy
Well economically wise we are at that point, so next up global conflict( not saying WW3 ) Lines are drawn, Allies are picked and out the shadows comes old enemy's.
greencmp
Indeed, I am patiently awaiting a reality check from libertarians on this.
Isolationism is not an option for the US.
Russia is not our friend.
greencmp
Skyfloating
This Putin guy puts my non-interventionist principles into doubt.
Indeed, I am patiently awaiting a reality check from libertarians on this.
Isolationism is not an option for the US.
Russia is not our friend.
zilebeliveunknown
We knew that already here on ATS by using logical thinking!
With or without insignia, those were Russian troops.
greencmp
Skyfloating
This Putin guy puts my non-interventionist principles into doubt.
Indeed, I am patiently awaiting a reality check from libertarians on this.
Isolationism is not an option for the US.
Russia is not our friend.
Skyfloating
greencmp
Indeed, I am patiently awaiting a reality check from libertarians on this.
Isolationism is not an option for the US.
Russia is not our friend.
I`m that libertarian who is confronted with something that requires a different course of action than my general ideology prescribes. Not that it changes the general ideal of non-intervention, it merely suggests that changing global contexts require flexibility and exceptions.edit on 2014 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)
greencmp
Skyfloating
This Putin guy puts my non-interventionist principles into doubt.
Indeed, I am patiently awaiting a reality check from libertarians on this.
Isolationism is not an option for the US.
Russia is not our friend.
Rosinitiate
Doesn't anyone care what the Ukrainians think about all this? Why is anyone on ATS taking the side of any government? We are falling for there trap of dividing the masses and sleight of hand.
greencmp
Skyfloating
This Putin guy puts my non-interventionist principles into doubt.
Indeed, I am patiently awaiting a reality check from libertarians on this.
Isolationism is not an option for the US.
Russia is not our friend.
zilebeliveunknown
reply to post by Soshh
Hello, hello, anybody home???
zilebeliveunknown
reply to post by Soshh
We knew that already here on ATS by using logical thinking!
With or without insignia, those were Russian troops.
zilebeliveunknown
reply to post by Soshh
Hello, hello, anybody home???
We knew that already here on ATS by using logical thinking!
With or without insignia, those were Russian troops.
Nikola014
greencmp
Skyfloating
This Putin guy puts my non-interventionist principles into doubt.
Indeed, I am patiently awaiting a reality check from libertarians on this.
Isolationism is not an option for the US.
Russia is not our friend.
Agree. Interfere. Just one question. If the US interfere some more, and indeed send troops, will you be among them? Will you fight someone else's battle?
And I think it's about time the humankind starts all over. Which means a big war must happen, with most of the human population dying, allowing people in power to start all over again.
Nice logic.edit on 17-4-2014 by Nikola014 because: (no reason given)
Forget investigative reporting, even critical commentary is now out of bounds as the Kremlin clamps down on Web news sites.
Until this week, a handful of websites seemed to be the last bastions of the free press in Russia. But on Thursday those bastions fell. The Kremlin blocked three independent news sites, including one run by former world chess champion Garry Kasparov, as well as a widely read investigative blog, Livejournal.com, by Alexei Navalny.
Only two years ago, during protests in Moscow against the return of Vladimir Putin to the presidency, the Russian online media played a key role mobilizing demonstrations. They were called the front line of democracy in an ever less democratic state. They were popular and they were the only media able to operate freely since television had come under government control and the newspaper industry fell into the hands of oligarchs loyal to the Kremlin.
How, then, did Putin manage what some are calling an “online coup d'état?”
SLAYER69
reply to post by VirusGuard
With Last Media Critics Blocked, Putin Silences the Russia Press
Forget investigative reporting, even critical commentary is now out of bounds as the Kremlin clamps down on Web news sites.
Until this week, a handful of websites seemed to be the last bastions of the free press in Russia. But on Thursday those bastions fell. The Kremlin blocked three independent news sites, including one run by former world chess champion Garry Kasparov, as well as a widely read investigative blog, Livejournal.com, by Alexei Navalny.
Only two years ago, during protests in Moscow against the return of Vladimir Putin to the presidency, the Russian online media played a key role mobilizing demonstrations. They were called the front line of democracy in an ever less democratic state. They were popular and they were the only media able to operate freely since television had come under government control and the newspaper industry fell into the hands of oligarchs loyal to the Kremlin.
How, then, did Putin manage what some are calling an “online coup d'état?”