It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
stormcell
So, the activists must work closely with the politicians and the federal and state agencies to make it too expensive for the ranchers to stay in business — force them into bankruptcy.
originally posted by: paxnatus
Yes, its about one man and his cows and so claimed government property that he will not pay grazing fees on! NO! No! No! Stop and think about it! If the feds used this much force on one man and his cattle what will they do to all of us when we face a similar yet bigger situation!
Remember this!!
" A House Divided Will Not Stand"
"A House UNITED Will Not Fall!!!!
Thanks Pax
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: NorEaster
You talk a big game. You should post your address on here and see if all theese people are all talk.
originally posted by: paxnatus
Yeah!! It's debunked alright!!
originally posted by: xuenchen
The "debunked" parts might get rejuvenated when it comes out that a brand new solar/wind project might be in preliminary stages.
A project that would allow the Gold Butte area to be used again as the "catch basket" for the environmental impacts caused by new installations right on the border areas of the Gold Butte National Conservation Area !!
Or even inside it.
All highly speculative and conspiratorial of course because only a conspiracy by the ones who profit can make it possible.
[ crosses fingers behind back ]
originally posted by: WCmutant
a reply to: Mamatus
I don't disagree with the findings. Their are simple facts that wouldn't require THIS much investigation:
1. Solar Farms require easy access to power lines (there is a length limit) OR easy access to a substation.
2. Golden Butte is in BFE Nevada and most likely doesn't have easy access to either.
Regardless, there are some strange timelines regarding this:
1. 1993 stopped paying fees
2. 1998 court order for Mr. Bundy to remove his cattle
3. 2013 new court order to remove cattle
4. 2014 actual removal of cattle, protests/stand-off
Now, why didn't they remove his cattle prior to 2014? You know AFTER the original 1998 ruling? Really??? It took them 16 years and a 2nd court order to finally start the process of removing cattle?
Something is a little odd about the presented timeline. I feel something is missing. (It may not be, but s#!t doesn't add up.)
originally posted by: NorEaster
This federal government can obliterate any nation on earth in a weekend.
originally posted by: NorEaster
originally posted by: paxnatus
Yes, its about one man and his cows and so claimed government property that he will not pay grazing fees on! NO! No! No! Stop and think about it! If the feds used this much force on one man and his cattle what will they do to all of us when we face a similar yet bigger situation!
What force? The guy's walking around like he swinging 10 pounds of man-meat after his "clash" with the federal government. Believe me. This federal government can obliterate any nation on earth in a weekend. Bundy and the fatboys would take less than 5 minutes to vaporize if the feds really wanted to use force. They're definitely allowing that idiot all the rope in the world, and for the last 20 years no less.
Remember this!!
" A House Divided Will Not Stand"
"A House UNITED Will Not Fall!!!!
Thanks Pax
Are you trying to get elected student council president with that dumb sh*t? WTF?
Try taking a deep breath and maybe you won't come across so much like a hysterical 12 yr old girl.
if you stopped posting and started actually doing something about the stuff you see that you hate