It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
beezzer
Agreed.
We need to spend more time and money teaching children about "my two mommies", abortion, how to put on a condom, bullies, how bad the founding fathers were, how awesome Obama is, etc.
windword
beezzer
Agreed.
We need to spend more time and money teaching children about "my two mommies", abortion, how to put on a condom, bullies, how bad the founding fathers were, how awesome Obama is, etc.
I'd rather our teenagers were being taught about the importance of social tolerance, dealing with bullies, that our founding fathers weren't perfect and even owned slaves, family planning responsibilities and methods and respect for our elected and appointed officials, than pseudo science, talking snakes and curses and zombies walking around Jerusalem in 33 AD!
Crap all over the bible if you wish, but once you start trashing zombies
When we first got this question, I thought "No problem!" I was sure I already knew the answer, and that it has to do with the blood of Christ, and became a "naughty" word because it was blasphemous. Other, more depraved members of the SDSAB were sure it had to do with menstrual blood.
Turns out we were all wrong. According to the Oxford English Dictionary:
The OED says the origin is uncertain, but possibly refers to "bloods" (aristocratic rowdies) of the late 17th-early 18th centuries ... "bloody drunk" arising from '"drunk as a blood" ... and the association with bloody battle, bloody butcher, etc., "appealed to the imagination of the rough classes." They add, "There is no ground for the notion that 'bloody', offensive as ... it is now to polite ears, contains any profane allusion or has connection with the oath ' 's blood!', referring to the blood of Jesus."
how bad the founding fathers were, how awesome Obama is
.
"[When] the [Virginia] bill for establishing religious freedom... was finally passed,... a singular proposition proved that its protection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word "Jesus Christ," so that it should read "a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion." The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend within the mantle of its protection the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo and infidel of every denomination." --Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:67
BuzzyWigs
reply to post by beezzer
how bad the founding fathers were, how awesome Obama is
Flag on the field!
What are you talking about? Who said anything about the Founding Fathers being bad? Or about Awesomeness of Obama??
Did you seriously alert the mods? I don't get you, beezzer.
You want us all to go back and hastily retract the entire thread?
Really?
We know you hate Obama. That has nowt/nothing/zip/nada to do with teaching kids the Bible is "all true".
As a fan of spreading truth and not ignorance I apologize for the misinformation.
BuzzyWigs
We know you hate Obama. That has nowt/nothing/zip/nada to do with teaching kids the Bible is "all true".