posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 12:03 PM
A "a nice clear vision"? We are looking at a highly compressed version of this video. It's also amusing that when a poster asked if there was a
link to the original video, they were directed to the embedded, compressed video. That is not the original video that the witness shot.
It's interesting that people choose to describe the "object" as hovering. It means you've already decided that this thing is in the sky. Couldn't
you also describe it as stationary? It never moves.
Remember that the only time you are watching the witnesses video is when the date/time stamp is in picture. All other footage is being magnified in
post which doesn't enhance the image, it just magnifies the artifacts. When they do a close-up and the camera is shaking, it gives the impression
that the object is moving.
Watch nothing but :12 to :23 which is as close to the original video as anything they show. Keep an eye on the clouds. The "object" never moves,
only the camera moves. Watch nothing but :12 to :23. It looks like a spec of mud, a mark or something drawn on the outside of a window that the video
is being shot through. Ignore every other second of that video and all of it's sound and it should be obvious that this video is a joke.