It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

((NEW)) Geoengineering And The Collapse Of Earth 2014. Its worse than you think! A big eye opener.

page: 5
14
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 08:40 AM
link   

randyvs
All I know is I don't like it, that's all.


I think we can all agree. I'd rather have clear blue skies as well. Unfortunately, people don't like to travel by horse and buggy, nor row boat.

But long before I worry about "the bad man" dispersing any death agents at 30,000 feet, I'd be much, much more worried about them drilling into a water pipeline and pumping some bad juice in there. At 30,000 feet, even a top engineer would only be able to narrow down the landing area by a few hundred miles, and even then could be off by + or - a few thousand miles. It's just not a very good method of dispersing anything. see here.

Until teleportation is a reality, I am afraid we will have to deal with man made clouds. (plus, that whole fly thing kind of creeps me out)




posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 08:41 AM
link   

randyvs
some psycho leader could just decide to
deploy cyanide, or agent orange, or ricine gas, or what have you. And what would
we know about it ?


Well, as it would have no virtually no effect if sprayed from the normal height of a jet.....


All I know is a normal contrail dissipates and is gone almost immediately.Then there's these other ones that last all day.


What makes you make the silly claim contrails dissipate almost immediately?



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 08:43 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Luckily, cloud seeding is nothing sinister of evil. Otherwise, these guys wouldn't have such a snappy website.



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 08:51 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 





People are going to want to know how you know what you know when you say you don't know. Ya know?


I'll resist the temptation to invoke Rumsfeld and ask, what is there to not know
when my eyes see a difference?



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 08:53 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


contrailscience.com...

In case you are interested in the scientific answer.



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 08:57 AM
link   

randyvs
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 





People are going to want to know how you know what you know when you say you don't know. Ya know?


I'll resist the temptation to invoke Rumsfeld and ask, what is there to not know
when my eyes see a difference?


You've much to learn about "resisting"


Ok, you see a difference. I see many differences as well. What I never see is a reasonable explanation from the "chemtrail" promoters as to the cause for said differences. Do you have one? ND's link does.



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:00 AM
link   

network dude
reply to post by randyvs
 


Luckily, cloud seeding is nothing sinister of evil. Otherwise, these guys wouldn't have such a snappy website.


Ya I think sister Bertril deserves a little trust also.
And I'm no way arguing that chemmies are happening.
But then again, what's with all the cloud seeding when
there are no clouds? Cloud seeding clear skys doesn't make
much sense to me, but I haven't looked over your links yet
either. I will.



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:08 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


I'm sure you guys have solid arguments. I'm just pointing out there
are some concerns that you can't speak to because, no one can tell
the future. And I can remember a time when the skys weren't criss
crossed with vapor trails like today. Not at all.

Just had a look at the contrail science link and that explains that there
are contrails that turn into a type of cirrus cloud rather well. I just don't
get why that wasn't always the case, at least in my mind. I'll concede my
uneducated concerns are nullified no problem. Glad to do it.
edit on Ram41714v222014u11 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:17 AM
link   

randyvs

network dude
reply to post by randyvs
 


Luckily, cloud seeding is nothing sinister of evil. Otherwise, these guys wouldn't have such a snappy website.


Ya I think sister Bertril deserves a little trust also.
And I'm no way arguing that chemmies are happening.
But then again, what's with all the cloud seeding when
there are no clouds? Cloud seeding clear skys doesn't make
much sense to me, but I haven't looked over your links yet
either. I will.


Who is seeding clear skies?



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:18 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 



I'm sure you guys have solid arguments. I'm just pointing out there are some concerns that you can't speak to because, no one can tell
the future.

You haven't been talking about the future. Let's goooooo to the video tape. (~Warner Wolf)

randyvs
reply to post by unknown32
 


I tell you one thing is the absolute truth. Psychopaths gravitate to places of power. And it is so reflected by what is going on in the world today. So the only solution is to kick everyone currently in positions of power, to the curb. Don't kill 'em but mark 'em and let 'em rot. Only then we will see the evidence of chemtrails. When they no longer hang in the air for days. Instead of disappearing one mile behind the craft as a normal contrail does.
edit on Rpm41614v052014u08 by randyvs because: (no reason given)


Readers will certainly see that as referring to the present time and why shouldn't they?



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:26 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 





Readers will certainly see that as referring to the present time and why shouldn't they?



I'm sure readers can deduce that statement entails a lot more than just chemtrails my man.
I stand by that statement universally applied.

But

Just had a look at the contrail science link and that explains that there
are contrails that turn into a type of cirrus cloud rather well. I just don't
get why that wasn't always the case, at least in my mind. I'll concede my
uneducated concerns are nullified no problem. Glad to do it.

Fair enough?
edit on Ram41714v27201400000046 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:39 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 



Fair enough?

Almost! There's just this one thing left


I'm sure readers can deduce that statement entails a lot more than just chemtrails my man.

Yeah it did but it includes "chemtrails". If you're going to


I stand by that statement universally applied.
Then you need to substantiate the reality of the claimed "chemtrails" or denounce them.

Fair enough?



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:48 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


I'll just say this.
I'm satisfied that the argument against chemicals being sprayed in the
air, is more than sufficient at this time. And I will continue to tell people I
know that chemtrails aren't happening. As I've done in the past up to now.
I'll sign with an X.

Fair enough?

Fist bump?
edit on Ram41714v562014u31 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Yeah that's fair. The important thing is you've seen the light so to speak on this issue.



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 10:25 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 




posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 10:34 AM
link   
reply to post by UNIT76
 


Now that's ominous! lol



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 01:30 PM
link   

randyvs
I just don't
get why that wasn't always the case, at least in my mind.

contrailscience.com...

My personal experience is that I remember seeing lasting trails most of my life. I was curious about why some lasted and some didn't. Apparently, since the internet wasn't around, I didn't have anyone to ask. (reading was waaay to much like school work)

And if you read far enough into that link, it will explain the newer jet engines that are much more fuel efficent, but have a byproduct of leaving more trails. Couple that with more air traffic then there used to be and POOF! A conspiracy is born.

Or maybe "they" really are out to get you. Muahahahahaha!



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
reply to post by network dude
 


All I know is a normal contrail dissipates and is gone almost
immediately.


How do you know that?

It makes no sense to me - clouds can last for hours - even days, and contrails are a type of cloud - so why can't they last for ages??



posted on Apr, 17 2014 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

good old 'jake the mus(cle)'
he was a fish out of water in a world he didn't create
an abusive and self destructive machine
but deep down he knew the difference between right & wrong
he spent most of his time chasing various tails
but when he put his little mind to something
he was a force to be reckoned with
and like a pitbull, he never let go
 

SCENES MISSING
 

fwiw, this wasn't worse than i thought?
sophia smallstorm already did a big poo on this carpet (synthetic biology, and the latter offering where she embraced and expanded the old chestnut of bugs emerging from peoples skin, yet failed to provide a single blurry picture)
chemtrails is just one facet of a sophisticated worldwide scam
seeing yet another doco pushing yet another tired angle using yet another proven-to-be-false piece of footage is par for the course these days
remember, there's "nothing to see" while wating in line for the kool aid,
see you in the underground sugar caves



posted on Apr, 18 2014 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a a reply to: network dude
reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: UNIT76
Alright you guys, enjoy the beating of dead horse randyvs.
But someday, just like Unit says, I'll be back. May not be
this topic. But one day you dead horse beaters will slip.
And when you do? I'll be there and you'll find out just who
Randy really is. So don't forget my name. You'll see Randy in
whole new light. So don't forget to remember not to forget
my name. You'll see, I'll be back and everyone will know who
Randy is after that day. I'll show 'em, yes indeed. Next time for
sure I will boy. So don't forget me you rug run'n, horse beat'n,
curtain climb'n, gravy grab'n, cookie crumblin, fellow members.
Signed Randyvious Astrocometus.

"poke him with a stick and see if he moves"



Take'n my ball and go'in home!


edit on Rpm41814v06201400000053 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join