US in Iraq worse than Hitler, page 7

When you start out a military campaing under that premise, what end result will you end up with? And how will you be perceived for pusuing that course of action unwaveringly after each 'righteous' premise ( 9/11 connection, nukes, WMDs ) is vetted as false?
Additionaly, when you're engaged in an urban theater and you employ many of the same attack strategies employed in a mountainous/open area region ( 'Shock & Awe', daisy cutters ), regardless of how precison a drop, you are still indescrimiantely killing innocent civilians, of which have bourne an exponentially higher death rate than actual fighters.

Now This.......

Fallujah Napalmed

News that President George W. Bush has sanctioned the use of napalm, a deadly cocktail of polystyrene and jet fuel banned by the United Nations in 1980, will stun governments around the world.

And last night Tony Blair was dragged into the row as furious Labour MPs demanded he face the Commons over it. Reports claim that innocent civilians have died in napalm attacks, which turn victims into human fireballs as the gel bonds flames to flesh.

Outraged critics have also demanded that Mr Blair threatens to withdraw British troops from Iraq unless the US abandons one of the world's most reviled weapons. Halifax Labour MP Alice Mahon said: "I am calling on Mr Blair to make an emergency statement to the Commons to explain why this is happening. It begs the question: 'Did we know about this hideous weapon's use in Iraq?'"

Since the American assault on Fallujah there have been reports of "melted" corpses, which appeared to have napalm injuries.

But since we have only embedded reporters who need to suckle on a military information officers teet to be allowed to report anything, and those brave souls who try to actually report the atrocities having their hotels fired upon or summarily rounded up by the Iraqi police, how is this story to be told? And when it is, the 'American Media' not carrying it is used as some sort of 'debunk', by virtue of their virtue!?
We've had classic fascism techniques employed throughout this cabals assention to power & subsequent creation of wars &how they're managed; people are too stupid or too in denial to think the label valid, when it so obviously is. Remember that German government official who made the same claim? Was it viewed how it should have been.......like Pat Buchanan speaking about Dwight Eisnehower or Tony Blair speaking about Winston Churchill? No, it was defused with the bluster of acrimony, where it should have been seen as a National simply pointing out as a warning a similarity of tactic employed by one of her country's historic figures.