Sharyl Attkisson: When I'd Get Under Surface of an Obama Scandal, CBS Would Pull Me Off

page: 1
17

log in

join

posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 06:41 AM
link   
Really interesting interview with Sharyl Attkisson on what really went on at CBS. She talks about getting shut down when she was digging into Fast and Furious, Benghazi, and Obamacare. Just as she'd get information that would show the Obama administration in a negative light, she'd be shut down on the story by the network. This isn't surprising to most of us at ATS, of course. Her story is more confirmation of the media manipulations that we know are going on.

Sharyl Attkisson - 'When I'd Begin Getting Under Surface of an Obama Scandal, CBS Would Pull Me Off'


"There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play."


Attkisson - CBS Brass Killed My Critical Reporting of Fast and Furious and Benghazi

Sharyl Attkisson: 'I was called a troublemaker at CBS for looking into Benghazi

Four weeks ago, former CBS News Investigative Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson resigned from her position after 20 years at the network. It was reported at the time by POLITICO that liberal bias was a major factor in the submission of her resignation.




posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 08:07 AM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 


All speculation, but this is why I don't really put alot of stock in blaming a President from either party. It was common knowledge back in the 70s that the people who owned the news organizations were the people who really pulled the political strings, setting policy and steering opinion.

I am no fan of this administration, but I was no fan of any as far back as I can remember...but perhaps my standard of following the Golden Rule is a little naive in a world motivated by power and greed.



posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 08:32 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueJacket
 


So you are saying the George W. and O have been treated equally?
You mentioned the possibility of being naive?



posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 09:02 AM
link   

BlueJacket
All speculation,....

I dunno' about that. It sure sounds like first hand information from someone who lived through it.
She experienced being shut down by CBS when her investigations came up negative for the administration.
How is that 'speculation'? Isn't that a first hand account ....??



posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 09:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Aliensun
 


No what I believe has happened is problem>reaction>solution. I believe, once again all speculation, that when during the previous administration there was a really big push-back regarding regulations being to confining that by developing a new admin that over regulates and blowing it up in the media, that soon a solution admin will be "elected" that will de-regulate everything in response and the puppet masters can go on about their business unabated.


More on topic I do believe Sharyl Atkinson(sp) is telling the truth, I just wonder whether or not it's for the reason "they want us to believe."



posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 09:15 AM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 


Well, I guess what I mean to imply is I am speculating as to the "why" its Saturday morning, I was in the backyard smoking Chicken and drinking beer a tad later than I perhaps should of, I suspect my thoughts are not yet fully gestated.



posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 09:16 AM
link   

BlueJacket
I do believe Sharyl Atkinson(sp) is telling the truth, I just wonder whether or not it's for the reason "they want us to believe."

She's telling the truth because .... She has integrity, or ... because she is angry with CBS, or ... because she's fishing for a job with FOX, or ... _________. But, however you slice it, it's the truth.



posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 10:50 AM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 


ABSOLUTELY INDEED.

Ever since at least 1915-1917 . . .

twoday.net...



22. "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. "An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers." U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917


What is it now . . . roughly 6 families control all the MSM . . . in this country or world wide? . . . certainly the situation is not much better worldwide.



posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 11:36 AM
link   
reply to post by BO XIAN
 


Yup.

Right after the Federal Reserve Act and the "new" IRS as we know it.

Almost like it was all planned in a straight line.

Big Evil at work.




posted on Apr, 12 2014 @ 11:49 AM
link   

xuenchen
reply to post by BO XIAN
 


Yup.

Right after the Federal Reserve Act and the "new" IRS as we know it.

Almost like it WAS all planned in a straight line.

BIG EVIL at work.



INDEED.

Planned in a straight line straight from hell.

With a return to hell for all the complicit stooges et al . . . straight back to hell.

Literally.

The fallen angels/purported ET's will NOT help in any redemptive way. They are around to deceive and to grease the skids straight back to hell.



posted on Apr, 13 2014 @ 05:48 AM
link   

Aliensun
reply to post by BlueJacket
 


So you are saying the George W. and O have been treated equally?
You mentioned the possibility of being naive?


There's so much truth in that statement. The treatment of W and Obama reveal so much bias in our media and political slants that it's mind boggling. Politically Obama has been very close to Bush (and virtually the same in his first term) yet the treatment and reporting of the two presidents on everything from Hannity, to NPR, to Fox, to MSNBC has been wildly different.

None of them are honest.





new topics

top topics



 
17

log in

join