It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Phage
reply to post by TritonTaranis
The spy satellite of today are incredibly powerful as I'm sure you're well aware, they can zoom in to a bottle top on the ground,
No.
There are very real physical (as in physics) limitations to the resolution an orbital camera can provide and it doesn't approach anything like that.
cnx.org...edit on 4/11/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
I can't. But in any case, those would be aerial images. Not satellite images.
Really because I can see my shoes out in my back garden on goggle earth
Phage
reply to post by TritonTaranis
I can't. But in any case, those would be aerial images. Not satellite images.
Really because I can see my shoes out in my back garden on goggle earth
edit on 4/11/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Since the early 1960s, super powerful spy satellites have been the stuff of the military and intelligence communities. Now two U.S. companies have launched commercial imaging satellites that offer the same sort of space-based images of the Earth to the public. One of these companies recently launched the highest-resolution commercial imaging satellite in the world.
From its vantage point of 425 miles in space, the 4,300-pound GeoEye-1 satellite orbits the Earth and focuses its powerful lens on the surface below, snapping electronic images that can resolve objects on the ground as small as 41 cm across (16 inches). That's approximately the size of home plate on a baseball diamond. These images are typically processed and sold to the military for mapping and to companies like Google, which makes them available to the public through its platform Google Earth. (Because of federal regulations, the publicly-available images are slightly lower resolution -- approximately 50 cm).
Not debatable, as your quote shows.
Debatable considering they use both methods
Phage
reply to post by TritonTaranis
Not debatable, as your quote shows.
Debatable considering they use both methods
16 inches is not a bottle cap and it isn't going to let you read the headlines on a newspaper either.
The figures on a license plate are about three inches (7.62cm) tall so in order to read those figures you would need a resolution of about 2 cm (3/4 inch) if you were going to be able to see anything but a featureless block for each figure.
The lowest practical orbit is at around 200km. Any lower than that and things tend to fall down pretty soon after being launched. Using the Rayleigh Criterion formula we find that in order to get 2cm resolution from 200km you would need to have a telescope mirror with a diameter of about 6 meters. To have a reasonable field of view you would need a focal length of something like 20 meters. We are talking about a very, very large satellite just to house the telescope (ignoring the camera itself and all the electronics). This is a 6 meter telescope:
Hubble has a 2.4 meter mirror and orbits at an altitude of 560km. It is clearly visible when it passes over my house. A satellite orbiting at 200km housing a 6 meter telescope would be...noticeable.
edit on 4/11/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
TritonTaranis
Deceived in the past, by whom?
The only dilemma here is facts and paranoia
TritonTaranis
pookle
TritonTaranis
tommyjo
NATO DEFENDS ACCURACY OF SATELLITE IMAGES WITH ADDITIONAL PROOF
11 Apr 2014
Mons, BELGIUM - Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) defends the accuracy of the images (found below) that were released to media on Thursday, 10 April 2014. The dates of the images released by SHAPE were collected by the DigitalGlobe satellite 'Constellation' between late March and early April 2014. The images are unclassified and are commercially available in DigitalGlobe's public archive. SHAPE did not alter or edit the images in any way prior to release.
Russian officials are quoted in various media sources claiming that these images were from August 2013, and that they depict an exercise conducted at that time.
SHAPE is releasing additional images alongside those that were released earlier, in order to clearly show that the claims of Russian officials are categorically false. These images, also taken from the DigitalGlobe satellite and commercially available, show the same areas of interest prior to any military build-up. The photographs, some dating from 2013, and others from early 2014, show that these areas were unoccupied prior to March 2014. There is no evidence of any military activity in these areas in 2013 or early 2014.
When reviewed alongside images released by SHAPE earlier today, it is clear that the military build-up of forces occurred in early March 2014.
SHAPE stands firm in its assessment that Russian forces in the vicinity of the border with Ukraine number in the range of 35,000 to 40,000 troops and are equipped with infantry fighting vehicles, tanks, combat aircraft, logistics, and artillery. These forces are destabilizing to the region, which is why the North Atlantic Council has repeatedly called upon Russia to de-escalate the situation by withdrawing troops from the border with Ukraine.
Additional images have been published on the website.
www.aco.nato.int...
Well there you have it Russia yet again caught lying through its teeth, what a surprise
Let's see the sympathises disprove the claim
Tbh it's good to see NATO responding and making an arse of the comical kremlins propagandaedit on 11-4-2014 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)
Plenty of hypocracy can be sent back the other way too.
Remember those Iraqis tanks lined up outside Kuwait? What bout those WMD's in Iraq?
What about Kosovo et al?
Remember those sanctions and costs Obama spouted? Then he fires back about Russia being evil when using the Gas debt by Ukraine to start pre payment?
The hypocracy in this whole thing is astounding.
edit on 11-4-2014 by pookle because: (no reason given)
Stay on topic please we're talking about NATO and Ukraine not the US and IRAQ where photos was never supplied, two totally different militaries/organisations not to be confused as the sameedit on 11-4-2014 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)
TritonTaranis
Ukraine has requested help from the international community, this is absolutely not a secret there are many international advisers in Ukraine working with the Ukrainian security forces to regain and bring about order, and stabilise the situation Russia is creating inside Ukraine
How can they be instigators lol
ColCurious
reply to post by TritonTaranis
TritonTaranis
Ukraine has requested help from the international community, this is absolutely not a secret there are many international advisers in Ukraine working with the Ukrainian security forces to regain and bring about order, and stabilise the situation Russia is creating inside Ukraine
How can they be instigators lol
The Ukrainian Government has requested help?
The Government in Kiev is not even legitimized by the people yet, as for stabilizing the situation: that is a situation that must be rectified ASAP - for the sake of the Ukrainian people.
Russia has violated international law with an illegal invasion of Ukraine, a sovereign and independent state. And its planned annexation is an attempt to redraw international borders in Europe, upending the principle of respect for international agreements guaranteeing Ukraine's territorial integrity and the United Nations Charter. We are calling for America's help at this critical moment in our history. We need the diplomatic support of the United States to restrain the Kremlin from further aggression against Ukraine, and to persuade it to relinquish its illegal land grab. We also are asking for technical and financial assistance to stabilize the fragile situation in our country in the wake of a popular change of government.
From a satellite image? No. Street View does not use satellite images.
To be fair to TT's, I have seen the house numbers on main doors via Google Earth.
Davian
This guy's a shill for the power elite. I suggest we all ignore the hell out of him and boycott this idiotic propaganda effort.
Go look through his posting history if you don't believe me.
TritonTaranis
ressiv
?????? wat about the NATO rocketshield pointed to Russia through the years in every neighbore land at the russian borders.....
we just ignore it ?????
What you expect NATO not to have a shield when Russia has the largest stock pile of nukes on the planet?
Come on,
Let's also not forget Russia is the aggressor in Ukraine, Georgia, etc etc
PLEASE... Let's get back on topic guys
TritonTaranis
There is an interim Ukrainian government as care taker stand in in Kiev, until elections are held and the people vote in there new one... Hope this helps
This does NOT mean they don't have the right to Stabilise the country
TritonTaranis
I'm sure there is a mountain of different news sources you can look at to see Ukraine appealed to the international community at the UN, and to the EU & the US [...]
TritonTaranis
Stop trolling the thread Vovin
Save the accusations for another thread, Anything regarding NATOs proof of Russia build up?
You know this how?
Russia did not just suddenly start placing its military in its own bases just because of Ukraine.
Empty site near Belgorod before current military buildup - 7 March 2014
Mechanized Infantry Brigade/Motorized Rifle Regiment after military buildup near Belogorod - 26 March 2014
Empty site near Yeysk before military buildup - 14 January 2014
After Russian Military buildup at Yeysk - 22 March 2014