It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
randyvs
reply to post by bbracken677
Knives do not kill people, Forks kill people.
And guns! Whoops! People are going to draw comparisons to
similar events where guns were used.edit on Rpm40914v38201400000032 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
randyvs
But Murg you can't expect the truth to be accepted,
not when it ads up to even more truth. And what those
three things add up to is unacceptable. Because No. one it
finds just what some in this discussion are pretending to look for.
Which is the why? And two, the factors above would mean that
there really are some wicked people running our lives and this world.
And pretty much identifies who they are as well. Unacceptable!
"In the entire history of man, no one has ever been brainwashed and realized, or believed, that he had been brainwashed. Those who have been brainwashed will usually passionately defend their manipulators, claiming they have simply been "shown the light" . . . or have been transformed in miraculous ways." ~ Dick Sutphen
One of the most common examples of mind control in our so-called free and civilized society is the advent and usage of the television set. This isn't to say that all things on TV are geared towards brainwashing you. They're not. But most of the programming on television today is run and programming by the largest media corporations that have interests in defense contracts, such as Westinghouse (CBS), and General Electric (NBC).
This makes perfect sense when you see how slanted and warped the news is today. Examining the conflicts of interest is merely glancing at the issue, although to understand the multiple ways that lies become truth, we need to examine the techniques of brain washing that the networks are employing.
Mass Mind Control Through Network Television
Daedalus
LDragonFire
What would you wager that he was on a SSRI inhibitor? But if he is a minor will we ever know?
Prayers to those affected.
just wanted to point out that "SSRI" stands for either "selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor", or "serotonin-specific re-uptake inhibitor"...calling it an "SSRI Inhibitor" is redundant
kinda like calling an ATM (automated teller machine), an "ATM Machine"
but i agree, it would be MOST interesting to know if the person who did this was on an SSRI, or some other kind of psychiatric drug, as it does fit the profile...but yeah, if it's a minor, we'll never know...wouldn't want people to be able to establish a pattern, and go after the REAL problem....much easier to keep people tied up in the useless waste of time that is the gun debate..edit on 9-4-2014 by Daedalus because: (no reason given)
Bongripasaurus
reply to post by the owlbear
I'm guessing he is referring to all the other school incidents that involved SSRI's. Just my personal thought, maybe people should spend more time with their own thoughts, not their prescribed ones. But if you are in the need of some anti-depressant, I have heard of some stuff called cannabis that apparently works wonders.
TKDRL
reply to post by the owlbear
Do school councilors advocate kids be prescribed alcohol? Kids are being put on brain chemical altering drugs at an alarming rate, it is a legitimate issue.
TKDRL
reply to post by the owlbear
And I know plenty of people who should have never been on meds in the first place who are now all messed up and have to continue taking them meds because they are addicted. What's your point? Most parents think the doctors know best and defer to their recommendation unfortunately. Thankfully my parents sought out a second opinion before putting me on a recommended drug I had no need for.edit on Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:20:40 -0500 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)
AnteBellum
reply to post by Danbones
It was real look it up, there are a hundred more links:
Link
in defense of your point of view AB: