posted on Apr, 26 2014 @ 07:17 AM
a reply to: ziplock9000
The Interesting data is not the squareness of the markings as the term square is used only as a reference and not a geometric classification.
The devil is in the detail and here are a list of reasons why a course assumption of a new type of natural process should be avoided unless of course
ones interests and not aimed towards scientific research of our solar system environment...
1.....There are very few diagonals in the area and hardly any markings that do not meet another line.
2.....The evidence of strips of plots effectively written over older ones points to a complex process that cannot be natural else there would be gross
destruction of conformity of marking interactions.
3.....There is masses of arrays of strange columns and rows of items within the fields that are around 5 to 15 metres square which is the average size
of residential properties for humans though this would be a highly speculative suggestions so possibly some form of cultivated creatures or vegetation
4.....There is great evidence now that the Islands are partly composed of debris that was pushed towards them and cleared from the surface of the
5.....there is evidence that there is something very interesting underneath this areas surface but we are of course unable to discover what it is.
I could go on but there is too much too explain here but if you check out the greater picture that I took this smaller image from then you will see
that the greater area known as the banded terrain is twisted and contorted and thus there is no geological process in the immediate area that has
You may miss to watch my latest video and explore my latest Gigapan image to find out more facts.
Latest video youtu.be...
Latest gigapan image www.gigapan.com...