It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
168617
reply to post by mOjOm
I'm here to troll? Ok then, you give me observable proof that evolution is real... If I accept the fossil record as proof that evolution is absolutely correct that means I can give 100's, if not 1000's of proof's that religion is absolutely correct and from experts/scholars. So this in a way is only beginning bro, I'm not trolling anyone. I'm just testing the water right now. Why do you think I keep going?edit on 16-4-2014 by 168617 because: (no reason given)
168617
reply to post by mOjOm
I'm here to troll? Ok then, you give me observable proof that evolution is real... If I accept the fossil record as proof that evolution is absolutely correct that means I can give 100's, if not 1000's of proof's that religion is absolutely correct and from experts/scholars. So this in a way is only beginning bro, I'm not trolling anyone. I'm just testing the water right now. Why do you think I keep going?edit on 16-4-2014 by 168617 because: (no reason given)
I'd rather be ignorant towards it. It's just nice wasting your time like I waste my time explaining things about religion.
168617
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
That's fine but when I start showing you undeniable facts from the Qur'an, are you going to look at them and decide whether they are correct or false? Because I can show you plenty and that includes the prophecies which are be fulfilled right before your eyes. I think that you's are the one's who are short sighted..
Actually there is a God, but he's in fact infinitely 'more' than immature human beings at present times can comprehend!
mOjOm
reply to post by djeminy
I'll go read pg 7 after I post this. I'm still not sure why or how something can start and end at the same point but yet also have a path of evolution in between. Your start and end are the same so there is no change between the two. Plus, evolution wouldn't actually work like that. If I took a random dog species and isolated it, it wouldn't devolve back into a wolf. It would change attributes over time but wouldn't change back to being the same as it's original starting point. Although it wouldn't stay as it was either.
AngryCymraeg
168617
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
That's fine but when I start showing you undeniable facts from the Qur'an, are you going to look at them and decide whether they are correct or false? Because I can show you plenty and that includes the prophecies which are be fulfilled right before your eyes. I think that you's are the one's who are short sighted..
Riiiiight... So a book of fairy tales & myths somehow beats cold hard fossils? Hmmm, let me see.... Nope.
Human Embryonic Development
How could Muhammad (peace be upon him) have possibly known all this 1,400 years ago when scientists have only recently discovered this using advanced equipment and powerful microscopes which did not exist at that time? Hamm and Leeuwenhoek were the first scientists to observe human sperm cells using an improved microscope in 1677 A.D. (more than 1,000 years after Muhammad, peace be upon him]. They mistakenly thought that the sperm cell contained a miniature preformed human being that grew when it was deposited in the female genital tract [The Developing Human, p.9]
Professor Keith Moore is one of the world's prominent scientists in the fields of anatomy and embryology and is the author of the book entitled the "Developing Human", which has been translated into eight languages. This book is considered a scientific reference work and was chosen by a special committee in the United States as the best book authored by on person. Dr. Keith Moore is a Professor of Anatomy and Cell Biology at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. In 1984, he received the most distinguished award presented in the field of anatomy in Canada, the J.C.B. Grant Award from the Canadian Association of Anatomists. He has directed many international associations, such as the Canadian and American Association of Anatomists and the Council of the Union of Biological Sciences.
In 1981, during the Seventh Medical Conference in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, Professor Moore said; "It has been a great pleasure for me to help clarify statements in the Quran about human development. It is clear to me that these statements must have come to Muhammad from God, or Allah, because almost all of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later. This proves to me that Muhammad must have been the messenger of God, or Allah [The reference for this statement is on 'This is the Truth' (video tape). For a copy of this video tape please contact us].
Consequently, Professor Moore was asked the following question, "Does this mean that you believe that the Quran is the Word of God?" He replied; "I find no difficulty in accepting this."
During one conference, Professor Moore stated, "... because the stagein of human embryos is complex, owing to the continuous process of change during development, it is proposed that a new system of classification could be developed using the terms mentioned in the Quran and the Sunnah (sayings of Muhammad, peace be upon him). The proposed system is simple, comprehensive, and conforms with present embryological knowledge. The intensive studies of the Quran and Hadith (reliably transmitted sayings and reports of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him) in the last four years have revealed a system of classifying human embryos that is amazing since it was recorded in the 7th century A.D. Although Eric Statle, the founder of the science of embryology, realized that chick embryos developed in stages from his studies of hen's eggs in the fourth century B.C., he did not give any details about these stages. As far as it is known from the history of embryology, little was known about the stagein and classification of human embryos until the twentieth century. For this reason, the descriptions of the human embryo in the Quran cannot be based on scientific knowledge in the 7th century A.D. The only reasonable conclusion is that these descriptions were revealed to Muhammad from God. He could not have known such details because he was an illiterate man with absolutely no scientific training."
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by 168617
I see that you're not even denying that the fact that you're trolling.
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by 168617
I see that you're not even denying that the fact that you're trolling.
168617
when I start showing you undeniable facts from the Qur'an, ...
168617
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by 168617
I see that you're not even denying that the fact that you're trolling.
You should check out all those historical facts from the Qur'an.. Maybe even ask yourself where Western science originated from because it wasn't a bunch of English Pagans sitting around at Stonehenge.
AngryCymraeg
168617
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by 168617
I see that you're not even denying that the fact that you're trolling.
You should check out all those historical facts from the Qur'an.. Maybe even ask yourself where Western science originated from because it wasn't a bunch of English Pagans sitting around at Stonehenge.
The English didn't build Stonehenge, so I'm not sure where you're going with this one.
168617
reply to post by FlyersFan
Oh, I thought you were done but since your here, do you have any sources to back your opinion? credible one's btw, not Wikipedia?edit on 16-4-2014 by 168617 because: (no reason given)
168617
AngryCymraeg
168617
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by 168617
I see that you're not even denying that the fact that you're trolling.
You should check out all those historical facts from the Qur'an.. Maybe even ask yourself where Western science originated from because it wasn't a bunch of English Pagans sitting around at Stonehenge.
The English didn't build Stonehenge, so I'm not sure where you're going with this one.
I didn't say they built it... How about you re-read what I said.
168617 Maybe even ask yourself where Western science originated from because it wasn't a bunch of English Pagans sitting around at Stonehenge.
AngryCymraeg
168617
reply to post by FlyersFan
Oh, I thought you were done but since your here, do you have any sources to back your opinion? credible one's btw, not Wikipedia?edit on 16-4-2014 by 168617 because: (no reason given)
The last time I checked anywhere at all, Italy was still not at war with anyone.