It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NthOther
Why worry about "legal" recourse?
They're not following their own rules so I see no reason why the rest of us should.
We're not going to win playing by their rules. Throw legality out. It's useless.
mrphilosophias
Because Jesus said "Be not overcome with evil, but overcome evil with good."
MALBOSIA
The only thing that can be done is elect a president that is willing to change it. I believe Andrew Jackson was the last one to do it and Kennedy was the last one to try.
NthOther
mrphilosophias
Because Jesus said "Be not overcome with evil, but overcome evil with good."
Good and legal have nothing to do with each other. In fact, the latter is more frequently associated with evil.
buster2010
MALBOSIA
The only thing that can be done is elect a president that is willing to change it. I believe Andrew Jackson was the last one to do it and Kennedy was the last one to try.
Yes and what happened to the last two presidents Lincoln and Kennedy that tried to get rid of the Fed Reserve? They were assassinated. No president today has the balls to stand up to the Fed.
As cited here
"I know no safe depositary of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." --Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:278
"Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories. And to render even them safe, their minds must be improved to a certain degree." --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIV, 1782. ME 2:207
"The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes." --Thomas Jefferson: Diffusion of Knowledge Bill, 1779. FE 2:221, Papers 2:526
buster2010
MALBOSIA
The only thing that can be done is elect a president that is willing to change it. I believe Andrew Jackson was the last one to do it and Kennedy was the last one to try.
Yes and what happened to the last two presidents Lincoln and Kennedy that tried to get rid of the Fed Reserve? They were assassinated. No president today has the balls to stand up to the Fed.
Micah 6
8 I will shew thee, O man, what is good, and what the Lord requireth of thee: Verily, to do judgment, and to love mercy, and to walk solicitous with thy God.
9 The voice of the Lord crieth to the city, and salvation shall be to them that fear thy name: hear, O ye tribes, and who shall approve it?
10 As yet there is a fire in the house of the wicked, the treasures of iniquity, and a scant measure full of wrath.
11 Shall I justify wicked balances, and the deceitful weights of the bag?
12 By which her rich men were filled with iniquity, and the inhabitants thereof have spoken lies, and their tongue was deceitful in their mouth.
13 And I therefore began to strike thee with desolation for thy sins.
Because Jesus said "Be not overcome with evil, but overcome evil with good."
mrphilosophias
I don't disagree, however I noticed your ganesh icon. Surely Hinduism would encourage peaceful and lawful opposition to evil and corruption rather than violence would it not? Two wrongs do not make a right. While there may be an appropriate time for dutiful resistance to tyranny, it is certainly not prudent as a first measure of action. Wouldn't you agree?
cruddas
reply to post by Leonidas
So the fed is like a foot infection, we should just leave it alone until it finally destroys the united states? Or just accept what damage comes from shutting them down? Because i like to think humanity is a lot tougher than people give credit for, sure things may get really tough, but you can't let such a fear of that possibility stop you, that's what the fed and global elite have been using against you all this time anyways is the fear of retaliation from them if you attempted to stop their plans.
teamcommander
reply to post by mrphilosophias
I don't think it would be all that hard to get some coverage for this from the MSM.
Simply write up a story of how you are preparing to sue the Federal Reserve over it's violations of the Sherman Anti-trust Act and tie the violations of the law to Obama.
(i.e.) "It's Obama's fault"
This will be sure to be making headlines, not only on Fox as presented, but on other networks, MSNBC, as rebutal for his involvement.
From there it will go to any of several congressional oversite committies and I have no doubt there are several members of congress which will work to bring about court actions to get the whole mess straightened out.
Really quite simple if you think about it.