It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
168617
BELIEVERpriest
The beauty of New Age ideology is that anything you want to be true is true. It doesnt matter what the context of scripture implies, if you don't like it, you can just cherry pick your own wisdom and throw the rest away. Why conform to the Mind of Christ, when it can conform to you? Literal interpretation is often too politically incorrect and most of the time offensive, so why not switch to symbolism when its convenient?
When you are your own philosopher, you can never be wrong...not even in God's eyes.
That is New Age.
Politically incorrect? You do realise Political and Spiritual are two completely different things?
No, it's your understanding of the Bible that is sorely lacking.. If you cannot see what the bible teaches and from a spiritual perspective, how can you call yourself spiritual through any teaching?
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
contrary definition, opposite in nature or character; diametrically or mutually opposed: contrary to fact;
But you had tried to make a point in sort of a vacuum. Simply stated some children are in and some are out. Being a child of God in the essence that you presented guarantees nothing, means nothing on its face.
You cannot serve two masters
17He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, to him I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, and a new name written on the stone which no one knows but he who receives it.'
AfterInfinity
reply to post by arpgme
You cannot serve two masters
I only have this to say: if we have no choice but to choose a master, then why do we bother with fighting for freedom and privacy? You can't have it both ways. And no, 'free will' doesn't make a difference. You have the freedom to happily do whatever god tells you to do, or you can go straight to hell - literally. Gods banhammer is unnatural punishment, and I don't accept that as a natural consequence of being an animal.edit on 6-4-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
New Age beliefs that some Christians believe that is not supported in The Bible
FlyersFan
New Age beliefs that some Christians believe that is not supported in The Bible
Jesus Himself stated that He had MUCH more to teach the people, but they weren't ready to hear it yet. Therefore, the bible doesn't contain all the truth. There is more.
edit on 4/6/2014 by FlyersFan because: (no reason given)
when you're saying that stuff about serving two masters (and finish it all by suggesting you're an animal?)
even the mystic-inclined acknowledge the concept of "our animal nature vs. our human nature"
there is a good scene in the movie Dune that might be worth considering here? (when the bene jesserat tests paul with the box)
freedom?
..wouldn't that be eternal life?
I would love to hear your enlightening point of view on the subject if you even have one.
Akragon
Logarock
Akragon
reply to post by Logarock
Oh yes but what about the rest of it. The part that really made them mad to the point they wanted to kill Him. Most think it was because He said HE was the Son of God as in other place. But here what pisses them off is the total picture that He brings to mind......the rest of that passage...He was likening them to fallen angels.
"ye are gods and children of the most high....(the rest of it)....BUT YOU SHALL DIE LIKE MEN AND FALL LIKE ONE OF THE PRINCES".
In essence their "theos" amounted to no more saving power than the fallen angles.
The whole passage here and hardly a flattering of mans god qualities. In fact these people here that are being discussed are no more sons of god than the fallen sons of God. This passage is an indictment of the fallen nature of man as the same as the nature of fallen angles.
Quite true... but still children of God none the less... fallen or otherwise
Though he was still executed for blasphemy...
But you had tried to make a point in sort of a vacuum. Simply stated some children are in and some are out. Being a child of God in the essence that you presented guarantees nothing, means nothing on its face.
He also said of those of His day that all the innocent blood shed from Abel until then would be laid on that generation.....of "gods". Children gone to seed, gone after the way of Cain that will join the Devil and his in the lake of fire. In effect no longer children of God but children of the devil, sworn and adopted into same.
The point from the OP's perspective that I was trying to make is that "We are all children of God" is very biblical... it wasn't to get into a big theological discussion on that fact.
I personally am more of the opinion that we have the ability to "disown" the Father so to speak... Rather then being adopted by an entity that doesn't exist...
When Jesus said to the Pharisee's "Your Father is the devil" it means they choose materialism Rather then God...
As someone said earlier In the thread... One can not have two Masters...
They essentially made Materialism their God
3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Logarock
If they aren't coming from God then where are they coming from?
If your answer is Satan, then what about what I say sounds dangerous or evil? I'm only giving my own view, what I say only says to look within yourself for God, what's so wrong with that? There's nothing dangerous about accepting yourself.
Jesus called then sons of "diablos". They were diabolists. Has zip to do with materialism. Has to do with making false accusations. Not even accusations true or false as some would have it but false accusations.
Yea and I wouldn't get into a theological debate with me. Good move on your part.