It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SubTruth
reply to post by madmac5150
You are very wrong about progressives and conservatives wanting the same things in life.
Think I am nut's? Look how progressive people raise there children compared to conservative minded people if this does not show you the truth nothing will.
I do like your idea in principle OP but you are wrong.
BELIEVERpriest
I want to know why "conservatives" call Obamacare the Devil, but the Medicare alphabet is perfectly acceptable. Thats just stupid. I find it slightly amusing that most seniors dont even realize that their "private" drug plan is really co-opted by Medicare.edit on 5-4-2014 by BELIEVERpriest because: mis-spelling
BELIEVERpriest
reply to post by xuenchen
Same principle: socialized medicine. Obamacare would have no foundation had Bush not expanded Medicare. Both systems are illegal and put the patient's interests last.
SubTruth
reply to post by xuenchen
As I often do I agree with you. Many peoples view of the political spectrum is flat out wrong. The political spectrum is rooted in control the lack of control or laws is anarchy complete control or more laws is an Oligarchy. This is what we are currently living under.
BELIEVERpriest
reply to post by xuenchen
Same principle: socialized medicine. Obamacare would have no foundation had Bush not expanded Medicare. Both systems are illegal and put the patient's interests last.
BELIEVERpriest
reply to post by SubTruth
Illegal in the sense that the government never had authority to mingle with the 3rd party payor system. Personally, I find the 3rd party system to be a scam in the first place. All it does is inflate the medical and pharmacy costs. What ever happened to supply and demand? We replaced it with greedy middle men and the govt just compounds the problem.
xuenchen
BELIEVERpriest
I want to know why "conservatives" call Obamacare the Devil, but the Medicare alphabet is perfectly acceptable. Thats just stupid. I find it slightly amusing that most seniors dont even realize that their "private" drug plan is really co-opted by Medicare.edit on 5-4-2014 by BELIEVERpriest because: mis-spelling
Medicare is a completely different system than Obama.Care.
Two different donkeys.
The cost percentages per person are not the same.
BELIEVERpriest
reply to post by xuenchen
Same principle: socialized medicine. Obamacare would have no foundation had Bush not expanded Medicare. Both systems are illegal and put the patient's interests last.
BELIEVERpriest
reply to post by SubTruth
Illegal in the sense that the government never had authority to mingle with the 3rd party payor system. Personally, I find the 3rd party system to be a scam in the first place. All it does is inflate the medical and pharmacy costs. What ever happened to supply and demand? We replaced it with greedy middle men and the govt just compounds the problem.
BELIEVERpriest
SubTruth
BELIEVERpriest
reply to post by madmac5150
I often wonder what would happen if by some miracle, all Americans just decided to unanimously stop voting.
Are votes have not mattered for a long time now.........Carter=Reagan=Bush=Clinton=Bush Jr.=Obama=the next progressive.
This is true, but the votes of the decieved act as a cover for the despotism in our Govt. If everyone stopped voting, the Govt would'nt be able to use the "it's the will of the people" excuse. Im sure they would cook up some lame "polling" system, but it wouldnt stick.
loveguy
BELIEVERpriest
SubTruth
BELIEVERpriest
reply to post by madmac5150
I often wonder what would happen if by some miracle, all Americans just decided to unanimously stop voting.
Are votes have not mattered for a long time now.........Carter=Reagan=Bush=Clinton=Bush Jr.=Obama=the next progressive.
This is true, but the votes of the decieved act as a cover for the despotism in our Govt. If everyone stopped voting, the Govt would'nt be able to use the "it's the will of the people" excuse. Im sure they would cook up some lame "polling" system, but it wouldnt stick.
Is that the only means we have to vote with confidence? By not voting, it shows who we have/don't have confidence in?