It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
zatara
minkmouse
Full on ww3 without nukes? If humanity is sane, this can be the only plan. Small power struggles growing into major ones with untold casualties I can see because that's just the way we roll but bringing nukes into the deal would be a lunacy beyond comprehension. Economic wars perhaps will be the preferred route but are they not just a slow nuke? Somehow I think WW3 will be different than WW1 and 2. Some of it will be on the ground physical and some will be stuxnet derivatives etc, etc. At the end of the day, some twat will make a handsome profit. Nukes will be the forced checkmate, no resolve...All bets are off! And if there are indeed bunkers, that's where the architects will be.edit on 3-4-2014 by minkmouse because: (no reason given)
Many people think that WW3 will start in the middle east. Not only because of the biblical armagedon but also because of the perpetual religious fanatics in that area. Hopefully the nuclear exchange between Israel and the many enemies will be kept contained in that region and will the nations with global distructive power not interfere. Once these heavy weights like China, Russia and the US start throwing nuclear bombs at eachother everything will be kaput.
demus
zatara
minkmouse
Full on ww3 without nukes? If humanity is sane, this can be the only plan. Small power struggles growing into major ones with untold casualties I can see because that's just the way we roll but bringing nukes into the deal would be a lunacy beyond comprehension. Economic wars perhaps will be the preferred route but are they not just a slow nuke? Somehow I think WW3 will be different than WW1 and 2. Some of it will be on the ground physical and some will be stuxnet derivatives etc, etc. At the end of the day, some twat will make a handsome profit. Nukes will be the forced checkmate, no resolve...All bets are off! And if there are indeed bunkers, that's where the architects will be.edit on 3-4-2014 by minkmouse because: (no reason given)
Many people think that WW3 will start in the middle east. Not only because of the biblical armagedon but also because of the perpetual religious fanatics in that area. Hopefully the nuclear exchange between Israel and the many enemies will be kept contained in that region and will the nations with global distructive power not interfere. Once these heavy weights like China, Russia and the US start throwing nuclear bombs at eachother everything will be kaput.
thinking that "nuclear exchange" anywhere could be contained in that area alone is naive.
zatara
demus
zatara
minkmouse
Full on ww3 without nukes? If humanity is sane, this can be the only plan. Small power struggles growing into major ones with untold casualties I can see because that's just the way we roll but bringing nukes into the deal would be a lunacy beyond comprehension. Economic wars perhaps will be the preferred route but are they not just a slow nuke? Somehow I think WW3 will be different than WW1 and 2. Some of it will be on the ground physical and some will be stuxnet derivatives etc, etc. At the end of the day, some twat will make a handsome profit. Nukes will be the forced checkmate, no resolve...All bets are off! And if there are indeed bunkers, that's where the architects will be.edit on 3-4-2014 by minkmouse because: (no reason given)
Many people think that WW3 will start in the middle east. Not only because of the biblical armagedon but also because of the perpetual religious fanatics in that area. Hopefully the nuclear exchange between Israel and the many enemies will be kept contained in that region and will the nations with global distructive power not interfere. Once these heavy weights like China, Russia and the US start throwing nuclear bombs at eachother everything will be kaput.
thinking that "nuclear exchange" anywhere could be contained in that area alone is naive.
Yes, interesting reply..can you explain why that would be a naive thought? Why will a nuclear war in the middle east expand into a world wide nuclear war?
intrptr
reply to post by alldaylong
All those links prove is that the US met with UK to keep them abreast of the progress of the bomb and subsequent agreements it should be built and used. I am sure that the US would have gone ahead any which way.
The fact remains the US invented, developed and deployed said weapons on Japan a_l_l b_y i_t_s_e_l_f. You act like they had to get Churchill's permission and he supervised it or something.
That wiki link states it is "in need of verification". Nice "rewritten" history lesson, though.
edit on 4-4-2014 by intrptr because: changed
The US didn't "Invent" the nuclear bomb.
alldaylong
The US didn't nuke Japan.
minkmouse
reply to post by Boscov
Damn dude, my heads hurtin now, and you had to bring in the old false flag card? IMHO that's a very wild card that would only be brought on by a religious faction of some sort which is a scary thought because I'm surrounded by the dolts.
YoComrade
reply to post by zatara
I think if WW3 is to happen it won't be by conventional means. A nuke will go missing and set off a chain of events, or Israel will be threatened by too many enemies. There are prophecies about it being attacked on all sides.
intrptr
alldaylong
The US didn't nuke Japan.
Your original post in this thread is absurd. Now you are down the road around the corner and out in the parking lot with some half-baked ideas (and links that "need verification") about a distorted version of world events.
Done replying to you here. Go play somewhere else.
BobAthome
name another country in the world at that time ,who could have financed BOTH projects,,
and NOT i repeat NOT have used SLAVE LABOUR!
and deadly serious about the slave labour part.
a lot of people were feed ,housed AND PAID very well,, at that time. in America.
and u could smoke too.
guidetube
reply to post by zatara
WWIII is plausible. A major catastrophe or shortage could easily kick start something.
We are poised to take advantage, to grow. Its true the winner will make the rules so you have to consider what you are following or influencing.
The hope is a small awaking with agreeable solution. The worry is something out with our control and a major conflict to survive or succeed.