It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
look the point of what I was saying a while back is that you guys are focusing on greer and you should spend time trying to explain the context of what all the witnesses claim but you don't. You keep avoiding the more important aspect of what THEY are saying because it is easier to pick apart Greer's past and speculation on his motives.
Notice how you focused on Mausson and the Mexican military and totally avoided the fact I also mentioned France and Britain, but those are the hard ones to dispel so you keep harping on one little part of what I was getting at as if you've deconstructed my whole point. You act like you aren't being ignorant when that's exactly what you rely on to derail the point of what I said. We can keep playing around like this all day but the more you do it the more ignorant you appear.
Notice how you focused on Mausson and the Mexican military and totally avoided the fact I also mentioned France and Britain,
same with this whole Greer thing- forget him and what can you say about the actual witnesses themselves? the one guy gave this whole theory on semi-credible vs fully credible witnesses and when I mentioned if one witness is 100% right then the subject is true and they didn't have anything to say after that. They just go into hiding and pop up later to snipe some more
BTW nobody has said the anything about the witnesses in this thread but you.
Actually I believe OP said something to that effect a few pages into the thread after they couldn't back up their Greer being credible researcher comment that started their thread so wanted to change the direction to move towards the witness testimony.
it's the only thing they got. and they ignore the gorilla in the room which is the hundreds of very credible witnesses. this is another example of how debunkers dance around issues as if they've proven something
Agreed, fine bash greer all u want. Got anything to say about the actual testimonies? ofcoarse the stories maybe wild, but even more wild and something that would work on the sceptics side would be finding one of those people to have fake credentials.
So now tell me why I should... Just
I was going to edit my post because I thought you might take as being directed to you, hell it was a reply to you, I just thought I would I leave it hoping you would get it that the stfu was at the last part of my post, how its become (the UFO forum) or many threads are simply a link to YouTube asking the readers to watch and discuss but OP hasnt done what they ask of us.
Sorry t, It wasn't directed at you.
here have a beer on me
reply to post by Destinyone
oh so NOW it's off topic like one of the mods couldn't have brought that up like ten pages ago. Funny how no one who took the time to respond to my original point about the witnesses mentioned that until now that they can't argue with it because it is exactly where they start the distraction
reply to post by hounddoghowlie
Take it easy killer. You don't have to believe Greer. The Disclosure Project is dozens and dozens of credible witnesses to patently incredible events. Just because Greer introduces them that makes their testimony bs? No.