It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Benevolent Heretic
You can THINK whatever you want. But there's a difference between your opinion and what the LAW is.
Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by doubletap
doubletap
You listed threats to health and safety, and in the case of fraud, an act which would cause actual damages.
Hurt feelings are not the same thing.
Yeah, and black people should just shut up and go to the next restaurant or sit in the back of the bus. Who cares if their "feelings are hurt"?
Jesus! People are so cold and unloving, I can't believe it!
Benevolent Heretic
Yeah, and black people should just shut up and go to the next restaurant or sit in the back of the bus. Who cares if their "feelings are hurt"?
Jesus! People are so cold and unloving, I can't believe it!
doubletap
As I said in a previous post, in the case of a bakery the excuse is as simple as "sorry, we have too many outstanding orders, your cake wouldnt be done in time". It's as simple as that.
Khaleesi
Okay let's take this one step further. You say a business should HAVE to do business with ANYONE?
Should a black baker HAVE to make a cake for a KKK member that says "Long live the KKK" ?
Officials in Oregon have ruled that Sweet Cakes by Melissa, a bakery that made national news after refusing to make a cake for a gay wedding last year, violated a lesbian couple’s civil rights.
In September, TheBlaze reported that, following intense scrutiny and furor among gay rights advocates that inevitably impacted business, the Kleins were forced to close Sweet Cakes by Melissa. Now, they’re operating out of their home.
Benevolent Heretic
I find it quite hypocritical that a business owner would choose to sin to show his judgment and disapproval of sinners. And I find it pretty crazy that so many here would support such an action. The hypocrisy is astounding, really.
“The LGBT attacks are the reason we are shutting down the shop. They have killed our business through mob tactics.”
doubletap
That is a result of unconstitutional laws forced upon the people by jackasses in government.
The solution is less government interference in peoples lives, not more, and certainly not more infringements upon peoples rights.
Gryphon66
However, I propose a simpler solution:
Let the shopkeeper post a list in their window of those they would rather not serve due to their religious beliefs. Let them make their bigotry publicly known. That's only fair, right? I know that I would not even darken the door of a "business" that didn't want my business.
Gryphon66
When you open a business that is a "public accommodation" the rights of private property do not apply.
This is true far back into English Common Law, which of course, our legal system continues.
Any question about equal treatment before the laws, State, local or Federal, is answered in the Constitution in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Further, the First Amendment prevents the Government from establishing a religion. These foolish types of laws are fundamentally flawed because they do just that. The States will realize this, just as they did with Jim Crow.
However, I propose a simpler solution:
Let the shopkeeper post a list in their window of those they would rather not serve due to their religious beliefs. Let them make their bigotry publicly known. That's only fair, right? I know that I would not even darken the door of a "business" that didn't want my business.
doubletap
They dont want equality, they want others punished for their beliefs.
Benevolent Heretic
And these bigoted Christians don't want religious freedom. They want others punished for who they ARE.
doubletap
reply to post by spurgeonatorsrevenge
Up until the passage and ratification of the 13th Amendment, those laws were unconstitutional. Fortunately the 13th rectified that problem.
Patronizing a business is not a civil right. Getting a wedding cake is not a civil right.
Government has no authority to force someone to provide services or products they would rather not deal with.
It basically comes down to this: If a bakery doesnt want to provide services to gay customers, cool, that is their right. There are plenty of other bakeries that will happily provide those cakes to gay customers, and as a result, those bakeries will flourish and the jesus freak bakeries will suffer financial loss as a result of their belief in fairy tales.
Bible thumpers have every right to make poor business decisions. It is their money to lose.
Personally, I avoid any business that advertises itself or has a reputation of being a "religious" company. Advertise yourself as a "christian company"? You wont be seeing my dollars. That being said, I am forced to defend these nutjobs under the guise of protecting their rights as business owners.
Any business owner has the right to refuse service to anyone they choose for whatever reason they deem appropriate. Anything less would be putting the business owners in a position of involuntary servitude, and that is 100% unconstitutional. Government has put business owners in the position of having to lie as to why service is refused, and that is the real travesty here.
doubletap
Benevolent Heretic
And these bigoted Christians don't want religious freedom. They want others punished for who they ARE.
Punished how? By having to go to another bakery?
Care to enumerate the punishments that are hoped for?