It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

clarification of ATS policy please

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2014 @ 10:41 AM
link   
While looking at a thread about Sandy Hook, I saw this:



First a quote from ATS site owner Springer:

Going forward anyone who posts a thread that seeks to implicate the innocent victims of the Sandy Hook Tragedy, for any reason, and/or posts any personal information or links to personal information on those people will have their posting privileges restricted and their thread removed without further discussion or warning.



I can't help but wonder about the issue of self-censorship on a conspiracy site. Is this a political decision to protect the board from the consequences of hot-button issues? Or does this policy stem from belief that no conspiracy can be this big and all-encompassing? Certainly the owner/management of ATS has heard of Wolfgang Haldig and others?


edit on 30-3-2014 by juspassinthru because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 30 2014 @ 10:49 AM
link   
reply to post by juspassinthru
 


I wonder if this censorship will also apply to questions about SH to someone like a Jesse Ventura or is it only on threads ?



posted on Mar, 30 2014 @ 10:53 AM
link   
If it might help from what has been said by ATS Ownership in the past? These two links show in more detail, what the stated policy is and the rationale behind it.

**ALL MEMBERS Please read: Sandy Hook**

SkepticOverlord' Statement on SH

There are others from Administration and Owners on the topic, and I'd encourage anyone with more questions to search a bit for them. Those two examples are representative.

As a Moderator, I follow policy as stated in the two links above.



posted on Mar, 30 2014 @ 10:56 AM
link   
reply to post by juspassinthru
 


The policy comes from this...



Going forward anyone who posts a thread that seeks to implicate the innocent victims of the Sandy Hook Tragedy, for any reason, and/or posts any personal information or links to personal information on those people.....


I think Springer was very clear on the issue in what he said.

Closed.




top topics
 
4

log in

join