originally posted by: NoRulesAllowed
I don't see that happening unless it was an attempt to fly into Petronas Towers.
Just because 9/11 happened doesn't mean all of a sudden pilots all over the world feel an urge to crash planes into buildings.
Don't get me wrong, there is (IMHO) no indication about bad/evil intent whatsoever.... they try to paint the pilot(s) as suicide terrorists and other
stuff because this is the screwed up world we live in where SUCH seems more likely than a fire on board? Give me a break. In reality the pilot likely
faced a HORRIBLE situation with a fire outbreak literally in the middle of nowhere and no way to land "any time soon"...and he is likely a hero
having tried whatever he could to save the plane. Everything else is tabloid media nonsense, even the SPECULATION that someone manually shut of
pingers, comms etc. It is my understanding that a fire in the electronics compartment, in the right location, can trigger those devices going
offline...it's a very unfortunate chain of events but it is possible.
You really really want to believe TPTB, don't you? Just about EVERYTHING you claim as proof of the cover story is misinformed at best and far more
There is a HUGE INCENTIVE to DENY a Skyjacking, because it is the only way to deprive the perpetrators of the notoriety they seek. Their claims of
responsibility have been reported and SUPPRESSED.
History has shown the frequent strategic uses of misinformation by governments, yet you would accept an explanation transparently designed for the
express purpose of minimizing panic, VERBATIM.
The cover story is what the Government, the Airlines Boeing and the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK would want you to believe for the simple reason it minimizes
But point for point your interpretation is FLAWED:
A single tap of a button would have sent a MAYDAY.
The transponders were shut down 14 minutes apart.
The plane changed course multiple times keeping it far from radar.
"Depressurizing the plane" is not an established fire suppression procedure as it would KILL THE PASSENGERS.
The garbled radio message is simply a garbled radio message, it doesn't indicate ANYTHING.
The "burning plane" witness on the oil rig saw a celestial object such as a shooting star.
The fisherman that witnessed the plane at EXTREME low level did not report either a fire or electrical fault as the nav lights were on.
The female yachter witness has appeared out of nowhere MONTHS after the HIJACKING.
Lithium batteries are not a danger when not being used or charged and when stored correctly.
The Petronas Twin Towers are the closest thing in the world to the World Trade Twin Towers and the Hijackers were from the same organization that is
alledged to be responsible for 9/11. Saying, "All of a sudden pilots all over the world feel an urge to crash into buildings" is ridiculous and
misleading, since the last time was 13 years ago.
There is not a single element to this whole affair that conflicts with the Skyjacking theory, yet there are DOZENS that show the cover story to be a