It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NATO.. Do Something!!!

page: 3
15
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 03:17 PM
link   

CALGARIAN

VictorVonDoom
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 


You're talking about violations of UN resolutions and international law. If anyone, the United Nations should be doing something about it. Syria, Ukraine, Southern Africa, and North Korea aren't anywhere near the North Atlantic. So it's not really a matter for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, as I see it.


Good point. Sorry, I should have said UN then or maybe just America.


I dont think you really should use america as the topic of the post, it would be even sillier. Why would america need to do something half the world away? Ah thats right spread democracy, like afghan and iraq?




posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 

Ok....but all the violators youre mentioning are in the areas of the Pacific, Mediteranean, Black, Arabian, China etc...seas and oceans basically.

So why again should the NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORG get involved when its not...frankly...in their encompassing areas???

Just the opposite. They should stay out of it.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 03:30 PM
link   
Okay good.

If we're going to stay out of it, we should REALLY stay out. NO picking and choosing.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by khimbar
 


Naww.. The West has systematically drawn down and disarmed. That's what I mean. It was being done in concert to and in cause/effect relation to the Russians for the most part, then we broke from that to keep on cutting at some point. (never money of course...not by enough to matter. Just actual usable things, which would matter in the real sense..)

The West has spent a couple decades in denial to history, in thinking we could impose warmer and fuzzier realities on a world that neither wants it nor would really know what to do with it if they had it. ...It's sure annoyed the world, as we've chosen to weaken ourselves. The exact things we don't want moving in opposite directions for trends, IMO. Hubris has been in thinking we could never see the rather sharp outcomes which have beaten others, all through history.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 04:10 PM
link   
The reason they aren't doing anything is because NATO and the governments of North Korea, Russia, Syria, Iran and Israel are all secretly on the same side...well their top-most-ranking individuals anyway. It's just the people of Earth vs. the Elite, and that is all it ever has been, and that is all it ever will be.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 04:59 PM
link   
CALGARIAN

We fought the world 50 years ago and with help of Russia we won...


I'm sorry...what? 50 Years ago America was starting it's hegemonic rise beginning with vietnam. I'm pretty certain Russia didn't help you with that one. So perhaps you meant to refer to WW2 which ended almost 70 years ago. Now, when it comes to WW2, America only participated in it for 4 years, Britain and Commonewealth countries had already been fighting the Nazis since September, 1939. Russia originally allied itself with the Nazis and the Axis powers, until German forces attacked the Soviets in 1941. As well as America, Britain and Commonwealth countries also fought the Japanese since 1942...erm, Russia meanwhile didn't fight the Japanese, it fought the German Army.

So tell the world again, who else were victors in WW2, and which countries helped America? Obviously, you haven't a clue on what you're trying to talk about.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 05:08 PM
link   
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 





Military might doesn't mean anything in the 21st century.


I bet if the Afghans occupied Ukraine in stead of Russia. NATO would have been all over their buts. American bombs would hav been flying left and right.

The thing is:: Military might is everything, that is why Russia can do what they are doing. The US can not declare war on Russia and than attack, unles they want to start a Nuclear war.

The US can do the same. They tried it With Syria but Russia steped up. So the US had to let go. Its not a weakness but tacktical smart unless you want ww3.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 05:36 PM
link   

angelchemuel
Cal my dear....are you having a rant?

Sit down and have a nice cup of sweet tea.
There just isn't enough NATO to go round sorting all that lot out.

I'm not being sarcastic by the way....if you knew me you'd know I'm not...just silly Brit humour.


Rainbows
Jane



No there actually is... Enough of NATO to go round

Nobody has ever seen a full strength NATO engage as of yet

And certainly North Korea Russia Syria could never hold back a NATO offensive







edit on 26-3-2014 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 05:58 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 05:58 PM
link   
Yeah, go establish a no fly zone over N.Korea.

First let me get some popcorn and clean my big screen TV from the cuppa I just sprayed over it.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:32 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:35 PM
link   

kathat
Yeah, go establish a no fly zone over N.Korea.

First let me get some popcorn and clean my big screen TV from the cuppa I just sprayed over it.


Does North Korea actually have an airforce?

Without air superiority it's quite easy



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:36 PM
link   

TritonTaranis

kathat
Yeah, go establish a no fly zone over N.Korea.

First let me get some popcorn and clean my big screen TV from the cuppa I just sprayed over it.


Does North Korea actually have an airforce?

Without air superiority it's quite easy



Please do, I need the entertainment.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Davian
The reason they aren't doing anything is because NATO and the governments of North Korea, Russia, Syria, Iran and Israel are all secretly on the same side...well their top-most-ranking individuals anyway. It's just the people of Earth vs. the Elite, and that is all it ever has been, and that is all it ever will be.


They really aren't

The Second World War never ended an neither did the Korean War

Syria is but a proxy between East and west backing Sunni & Shiite Muslims

Israel is just hated by Islam but supported by the west

I would have thought this to be common knowledge ?

Oh and one more thing.., the elites agenda you speak of is anti west propaganda or does Russia China not have there own ?bankers?
edit on 26-3-2014 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:43 PM
link   

kathat

TritonTaranis

kathat
Yeah, go establish a no fly zone over N.Korea.

First let me get some popcorn and clean my big screen TV from the cuppa I just sprayed over it.


Does North Korea actually have an airforce?

Without air superiority it's quite easy



Please do, I need the entertainment.


Please do what?

Enforce a no fly zone?

Why?

Why waste good men on the scum of the earth?

Sanctions have turned the North into a 3rd world, job done... It is now the responsibility of the people of North Korea to rise up and remove there dictator



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:44 PM
link   

TritonTaranis

kathat

TritonTaranis

kathat
Yeah, go establish a no fly zone over N.Korea.

First let me get some popcorn and clean my big screen TV from the cuppa I just sprayed over it.


Does North Korea actually have an airforce?

Without air superiority it's quite easy



Please do, I need the entertainment.


Please do what?

Enforce a no fly zone?

Why?

Why waste good men on the scum of the earth?

Sanctions have turned the North into a 3rd world, job done... It is now the responsibility of the people of North Korea to rise up and remove there dictator


Why stop now? According to many Afghanistan and Iraq were also 3rd world countries. Cave dwellers.



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:45 PM
link   

Yusomad
Why would america need to do something half the world away?

Yeah, why is it America's duty to police the world? Who elected America? People hate America enough already.

Sure, it's sad when countries fight each other and innocent people get killed. But this is the way of the world as long as there have been countries to fight. And before that tribes fought against tribes. That's how the world does business. That's how regional conflicts are settled (or not).

I think it's a much better policy to generally stay out of other people's regional conflicts unless they directly threaten to expand into global conflict.

And if you live someplace where they're lobbing missiles at each other, do what you need to do to get out of there. But it's up to you as an individual. Not America.
edit on 26-3-2014 by Blue Shift because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:46 PM
link   

mysterioustranger
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 

Ok....but all the violators youre mentioning are in the areas of the Pacific, Mediteranean, Black, Arabian, China etc...seas and oceans basically.

So why again should the NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORG get involved when its not...frankly...in their encompassing areas???

Just the opposite. They should stay out of it.


I agree but the problem is..

Evil prevails when good men fail to act

NATO has the power to stop it

But they won't, for the simple reason that the worlds safety will be put at risk



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:47 PM
link   

TritonTaranis

mysterioustranger
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 

Ok....but all the violators youre mentioning are in the areas of the Pacific, Mediteranean, Black, Arabian, China etc...seas and oceans basically.

So why again should the NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORG get involved when its not...frankly...in their encompassing areas???

Just the opposite. They should stay out of it.


I agree but the problem is..

Evil prevails when good men fail to act

NATO has the power to stop it

But they won't, for the simple reason that the worlds safety will be put at risk


The worlds safety put at risk hahahaha, the world safety was put at risk the minute nato started it's expansion eastward to the point were at the Ukraine red line now. The world's safety was put at risk the minute US started putting bases in other countries.

Now we cant get rid of you buggers.

If you think we are your allies, you're very mistaken.

When shat hits the fan, we're taking your bases and missiles in them. Nukes n all and you're OUT and if a yank gets in the way, we just out number em and hang em.


edit on 26-3-2014 by kathat because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2014 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Blue Shift

Yusomad
Why would america need to do something half the world away?

Yeah, why is it America's duty to police the world? Who elected America? People hate America enough already.

Sure, it's sad when countries fight each other and innocent people get killed. But this is the way of the world as long as there have been countries to fight. And before that tribes fought against tribes. That's how the world does business. That's how regional conflicts are settled (or not).

I think it's a much better policy to generally stay out of other people's regional conflicts unless they directly threaten to expand into global conflict.

And if you live someplace where they're lobbing missiles at each other, do what you need to do to get out of there. But it's up to you as an individual. Not America.
edit on 26-3-2014 by Blue Shift because: (no reason given)


Nobody elected America

But a school playground without supervision is unheard of

Sure the US has used it to there advantage one or two times... But the world would be worst of if everybody build big wall and ignored wrong doing to each other

It would be kaos without rules and laws, civilisation needs rules and laws period



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join