It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whats your theory about what happened to flight MH370

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 04:57 PM
link   
Very strange all together. The 'offical' explanation given by the officials about what happened to flight MH370 does not sound very satisfying. I wonder what your thoughts are about what really happened.

Of course it will be speculation and will the truth never surface but still....

I gave it some thought and came to the conclusion it must have been some accident. A navy vessel shot it out of the sky because of some misunderstanding or simple f"0&ku? The government involved had contact with other governments and came to the agreement to silent the whole incident because of the outrage it will cause among the families...and world opinion.

This consultation among governments is probably why it took so long before everybody got informed.

I think we live in a world where things are handled between nations this way and that the truth for the common people has no priority anymore.

Of course the official statement can be the simple truth but in my opinion too many strange things had happened before contact had been lost it to be a pilot error or mechanical failure. There is more to it than what they are willing to admit.

What do you think?




edit on 24/3/2014 by zatara because: (no reason given)

edit on 24/3/2014 by zatara because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:02 PM
link   
A satellite laser weapons test gone very wrong, maybe related to the people from Freescale Semiconductor.

I think that's why they brought people back from the ISS.

By the way, Popular Mechanics, our friendly neighborhood debunking machine is on top of it: 9 Things That Didn't Happen to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:03 PM
link   
reply to post by zatara
 


I think about 10 people are going to lash out at you for not another plane thread


I think it crashed, I was on the boat of a hijack but to much time has past and no one has taken credit and nothing substantial has come out to point to it.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:06 PM
link   
Its in the same place as all the planes in the Bermuda Triangle.. and that is what I believe... and who knows where they are at...



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:08 PM
link   
reply to post by zatara
 


Have you considered that what we have been told is actually the truth?
Sometimes what we are told is actually what happened.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Sremmos80
 


Yes, I was afraid of that but this thread is not about search parties, debris, radar images, satelite photographs.....just your final thought before the incident will fade away into history.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:19 PM
link   
I think it's gonna be used for a false flag. Perhaps in Israel so they finally have a good reason to destroy Iran.
I don't believe the official story because there are so many loose ends that are not connected yet.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Gold and currencies were on the plane not mangoes.

Hijacked.

Landed somewhere unknown as of yet in Southeast Asia.

Plane will be released after the loot is transported.

Released on site or flown to another location.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by alldaylong
 


Sometimes what we are told is the whole, coherent truth. Sometimes the truth seems unlikely, or pieces are missing but the truth is always coherent. Lies are coherent too, providing there is ample planning and excellent execution.

In this case, we were told many things that were either speculative and/or wrong. The noise level is so high, the true signal is lost. With no more evidence, this one is lost down the rabbit hole.

With the FDR, actual crash debris recovery, or other sovereign remote observation data to constrain the crash site, the "single distraught pilot" theory seem to be the front-runner. Dissonance on this front-runner is predictable.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:21 PM
link   
"No Proof"
even now no confirmed aircraft debris.
There is Always a Sat link and ACARS the digital info on that plane was partially working my feeling is this plane landed and that is also according to Rolls Royce who got a data ping from the Engines 8 hours later that they were shut off not crashed. these people are hiding something and no release of the cargo manifest except for batteries. there is more to this.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Kennedy has came back to life and took it riding a half elephant half bumble bee. He is currently holding it hostage in exchange for making double stuff oreos the first global snack food.... Seriously this is completely plausable given the facts we currently have on the 777.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:43 PM
link   
What absolutely baffles me is, so many members seem to think that the newest events mean it was not hijacked. The official MSM is now saying yes the plane went down in the Indian Ocean. That does not mean it was an 'accident'. That does not mean it was no hijacked.

If it went down in the ocean, this does not change the fact that SOMEBODY turned off the transponder and other devices in the plane and also diverted course illegally without telling anybody...Pretty sure that by definition that constitutes a hijacking.

The MSM said it was hijacked and they now say it has crashed, that is all; I dont know where some of you people are pulling 'I knew it wasn't hijacked' out of??

Also, being that the plane was hijacked; what are the chances it went down in the Indian Ocean on accident?? Either the hijackers sent it down on purpose or perhaps there was a struggle with the passengers and it went down. The ONLY thing accident that can be argued is that the hijackers accidentally ran out of fuel and the bird went down. That is the only accident which makes sense....

am i missing something or has ATS gone nuts?



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:50 PM
link   
reply to post by zatara
 


I think Chris Goodfellows description best fits the scenario. After last radio contact approx 1 hour into flight the time it takes for a fire in forward wheel due to low tire pressure upon take off, it then fire in the well burned through the firewall into communication wires, as the pilot and co pilot quickly were checking the fuse Busses to see what the problem was, the pilot input the computer to fly to PalauIuikawi (SP?) 13,000 ft landing strip. He took the plane to 45k to try and asphyxiate the fire then a quick dive to try and blow it out like a candle-failed, then the cockpit was over come with smoke and fire as well as the ventilation system. Everyone was dead within 20 minutes at this point the plane is blackedout with no communications except the engine pings, flying on automatic pilot passed the the airport the pilot was trying for kept going strait out over the Indian Ocean at 25,000 ft and ran out of fuel. the plane then went into a flat spin and ripped apart leaving behind the parts they are now picking up on satellite.

The Capitan and pilot of flight MH370 is a hero, he did his best to try and save the flight but under those conditions he chances of success were 1000 to 1. He should be commended and Boeing should take action to correct a front tire fire from ever getting through like an automatic fire extinguisher in the tire well.







edit on 24-3-2014 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 05:58 PM
link   
I don't suppose I have anything NEW to add. I have a question or two regarding the turn left after take off and want to hear theories as to why the plane would continue on the "southerly" course toward the South Indian Ocean until it ran out of fuel ? It is obvious that someone caused that plane to steer off course. If it were the Pilot, he would have known that there was only a certain amount of fuel, certainly not enough to make it to ? If there was trouble (fire, something causing decompression of the cabin) shortly after take off and the Pilot turned the airplane to the left headed for the nearest "safe" runway, everyone overcome by fumes/lack of oxygen, and then SWITCH the airplane to Autopilot and it continue to fly until it ran out of fuel? (Sorry, can't remember where I read that theory) I don't understand how an airplane NOT being controlled by someone could have flew THAT far... Apologies in advance if these questions have been answered already. I have been reading so much and threads are starting to run together!
edit on 24-3-2014 by TNMockingbird because: Didn't proofread well enough...



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Im baffled that nobody came up with obama stole the plane to cover romneycare yet



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 06:06 PM
link   
Supposedly it crashed and sank in the south Indian Ocean.
Tragic for the families and passengers.

Do I believe it??
Not necessarily, but,
YES, I think I will go ahead ad believe it.

The alternatives are just too unimaginable.



posted on Mar, 24 2014 @ 06:30 PM
link   
I would dare say it was landed at Diego Garcia, which could explain the sightings in the Maldives (even if the media have ruled them as false...). The pilot’s simulator reportedly had five Indian Ocean runways, including Diego Garcia programmed in. Perhaps, other than those 20 employees, the cargo was very valuable - tech/weapons or gold. I doubt they would have kept it on the base this long. Possibly stripped the decals and flown to Israel, whose Foreign Ministry employees have conveniently called a global strike and have flown home. Perhaps they wanted to get out of harms way if Israel is planning a false flag or a direct attack on Iran.

It’s all curious timing. I certainly don’t buy the media’s evolving stories. If it had crashed into land/mountains or the ocean it surely would have been spotted by someone by now with all these high tech satellites and whatnot. It surely couldn’t disappear in this day and age without help. Why has it taken Inmarsat this long to chime in with their apparent tracking of the plane to the Southern Indian Ocean? It’s just all too weird and disjointed. Unless of course we aren’t being told much of what is really gone on.



posted on Mar, 25 2014 @ 04:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Annunak1
 


If this plane is used for some attack anywhere in the world it would be Obvious where this plane had come from. Would it not be simpeler to use a rocket or what ever to launch an attack?



posted on Mar, 25 2014 @ 04:32 AM
link   
reply to post by zatara
 


That it lande on a very small, very lush green, hilly/mountainous Island, with some badly injured & some not, some slightly, & have gathered as much white cloth & fresh water, cold at night for them. A new reality show? lol



posted on Mar, 25 2014 @ 03:06 PM
link   
My theory is someone jacked this plane, turned off all the locator devices, then flew low to some deserted airstrip where they took either some VIP not mentioned in the press as a passenger, or a certain group of passengers hostage (for whatever purpose). Then, they drowned the rest of the passengers, put them back on the plane, took off and then set it to crash, parachuting out to a waiting boat, while the plane crashed. I mean, if I wanted to pull off a mass kidnap, this is what I'd do.

In the press, they'll go back and simply ignore all the evidence that shows the plane was diverted, citing mechanical trouble that somehow inexplicably had them flying for HOURS to go so far off course and then crashing. Likewise, they'll ignore any missing bodies (just couldn't recover them), and a couple days after the wreckage is found, the story will disappear like it never happened. All links to stories of previous evidence of altered flight paths will be "not found" and the only archived news will support the mainstream press line that the plane crashed, no matter how preposterous it is that they flew so damn far without any distress call, and supposedly while having a mechanical issue (instead of simply landing or crashing at a nearby airport).



new topics




 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join